AASCX : Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class A

AASCX is a US Stocks Market Mid-Cap Blend with HIGH fees.

AASCX

Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class A

FI Score

50 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

5 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

9 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

9 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,161 US Stocks Mid-Cap Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare AASCX vs ARTGX

48% FI Score
  • artgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Artisan Global Value Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare AASCX vs AWF

48% FI Score
  • awf
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund Inc.

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare AASCX vs BASFX

48% FI Score
  • basfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

BMO Short Tax-Free Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare AASCX vs PARPX

48% FI Score
  • parpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Putnam Short Duration Bond Fund Class B

Expenses: 0.82% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare AASCX vs LTNYX

48% FI Score
  • ltnyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Invesco Oppenheimer Rochester Limited Term New York Municipal Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare AASCX vs HMJIX

48% FI Score
  • hmjix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Hartford Municipal Short Duration Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.41% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare AASCX vs FFR

48% FI Score
  • ffr
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

First Trust FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Markets Real Estate Index Fund

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare AASCX vs EWUS

48% FI Score
  • ewus
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Other Region

iShares MSCI United Kingdom Small-Cap ETF

Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Region International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare AASCX vs FHARX

48% FI Score
  • fharx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Fidelity Freedom® Blend 2040 Fund

Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare AASCX vs FIMSX

48% FI Score
  • fimsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Fidelity® Municipal Income 2025 Fund

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare AASCX vs GDNA

48% FI Score
  • gdna
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Goldman Sachs Human Evolution ETF

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare AASCX vs TDIV

48% FI Score
  • tdiv
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare AASCX vs MISNX

48% FI Score
  • misnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

BMO Pyrford International Stock Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.94% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare AASCX vs COIAX

48% FI Score
  • coiax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Short

SEI Institutional Managed Trust Conservative Income Fund Class F

Expenses: 0.30% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare AASCX vs LZHYX

48% FI Score
  • lzhyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Lazard US Corporate Income Portfolio Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare AASCX vs MACVX

48% FI Score
  • macvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

MFS Conservative Allocation Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare AASCX vs LTXCX

48% FI Score
  • ltxcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

American Funds Limited Term Tax Exempt Bond Fund® Class C

Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare AASCX vs DFJ

48% FI Score
  • dfj
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Japan Stock

WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund

Expenses: 0.58% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare AASCX vs PTSOX

48% FI Score
  • ptsox
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

PIMCO RAE PLUS International Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare AASCX vs PRMAX

48% FI Score
  • prmax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Putnam RetirementReady Maturity Class A

Expenses: 0.38% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo