AACFX : Invesco Greater China Fund Class A

AACFX is a International Stocks Market China Stock with HIGH fees.

AACFX

Invesco Greater China Fund Class A

FI Score

34 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

2 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

6 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

6 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,038 International Stocks China Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare AACFX vs OURAX

16% FI Score
  • ourax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Mission-Auour Risk-Managed Global Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare AACFX vs RAGHX

16% FI Score
  • raghx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

AllianzGI Health Sciences Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare AACFX vs JETAX

16% FI Score
  • jetax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Aberdeen Global Equity Impact Fund Class A

Expenses: 2.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare AACFX vs CFRAX

16% FI Score
  • cfrax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Catalyst Floating Rate Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare AACFX vs CHCGX

16% FI Score
  • chcgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Chesapeake Growth Fund

Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare AACFX vs OFSCX

16% FI Score
  • ofscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Olstein Strategic Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare AACFX vs DAHYX

16% FI Score
  • dahyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Dunham High-Yield Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.37% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare AACFX vs DAREX

16% FI Score
  • darex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Dunham Real Estate Stock Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare AACFX vs DCSVX

16% FI Score
  • dcsvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Dunham Small Cap Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare AACFX vs CPAEX

16% FI Score
  • cpaex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Counterpoint Tactical Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 2.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare AACFX vs DGRPX

16% FI Score
  • dgrpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

Delaware Global Real Estate Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare AACFX vs PWREX

16% FI Score
  • pwrex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Pioneer Real Estate Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare AACFX vs EAIIX

16% FI Score
  • eaiix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Eaton Vance Global Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare AACFX vs ECTTX

16% FI Score
  • ecttx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Parametric TABS 10-to-20 Year Laddered Municipal Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare AACFX vs PGABX

16% FI Score
  • pgabx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Pioneer Global Multisector Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare AACFX vs RYLSX

16% FI Score
  • rylsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Consumer Cyclical

Rydex Leisure Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Consumer Cyclical Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare AACFX vs HPECX

16% FI Score
  • hpecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Highland Socially Responsible Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare AACFX vs MRAEX

16% FI Score
  • mraex
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Meridian Enhanced Equity Fund® A Class

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare AACFX vs RYMGX

16% FI Score
  • rymgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare AACFX vs PFDGX

16% FI Score
  • pfdgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

PFG Global Strategy Fund Class R

Expenses: 2.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo