NWHVX vs SCIJX Fund Comparison

A comparison between NWHVX and SCIJX based on their expense ratio, growth, holdings and how well they match their benchmark performance.

Group Created with Sketch.

Minafi's Take on NWHVX vs SCIJX

Here's an in depth look at the differences between Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund Class A ($NWHVX) and Hartford Schroders International Stock Fund Class SDR ($SCIJX).

To start off, here's a look at the basics of each fund. Keep an eye on the FI Score. That's a custom score from 0 to 100 that we generate based on how good this fund is for the casual investor. Most investors only need a handful of total funds in their portfolio. The higher the score, the more likely this is one of those few. Score alone isn't enough! Keep reading on to see how different (or perhaps similar) these two funds are.

33% FI Score
  • nwhvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

55% FI Score
  • scijx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Hartford Schroders International Stock Fund Class SDR

Expenses: 0.76% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Both $NWHVX and $SCIJX are categorized as Mutual Funds. Mutual funds are often offered by 401(k) platforms and are essentially the same as ETFs. Mutual funds are generally offered by an investment platform – Fidelity has Fidelity mutual funds, Vanguard has Vanguard mutual funds. Mutual funds are ideal for retirement investing since you can invest any amount. That allows you to invest every last cent and benefit from the market.

The biggest disadvantage of mutual funds is that you're usually limited to the funds on your investment platform. If you're investing on Fidelity, you'll want to pick Fidelity mutual funds (or any ETF). Same with Vanguard. Some platforms offer mutual funds from other platforms, but they may charge a purchse or redemption fee. I'd recommend using the same platform as your funds – or stick to ETFs.

To learn more about the difference between these two, you can read about the difference between ETFs and Mutual Funds.

When evaluating a fund, the first things I look at are:

  • What it invests in
  • How much it charges in fees
  • How large the fund is

Let's look into these criteria one by one and see if either of these funds stands out.

Fund Holdings Comparison

Minafi's FI Score algorithm takes into account the category and market. The more niche a fund is, the lower the score. This doesn't mean it's a worse fund, but it does mean you should stop and make sure this a fund you need to diversify your portfolio.

NWHVX SCIJX
Market Score 4.2 /10 5.4 /10
Category Score 5.0 /10 10.0 /10
Total 9.2 15.4

A score of 10 means this is a solid market and category that almost every investor will want to have investments in. The lower the score, the more specific the investment. These scores are based on when most investors would add these funds to their portfolio. A score of 10 means that this fund (or one like it) belongs in a three-fund portfolio. The lower the score, the farther down in your portfolio a fund would go.

Winner: $SCIJX

Fee Comparison

Fees are one of the biggest killers of portfolio growth. The difference between a 2% fee and a 0.04% fee over 30 years can result in your portfolio having half the total value!

If you're just getting started investing and learning how fees impact your portfolio, I'd encourage you to read through my free investment course (specifically '2.2 - All About Fees') where I go over all the different types of fees you can be charged and how to lower them.

For these two funds, NWHVX has an expense ratio of 1.18% while SCIJX has an expense ratio of 0.76%.

Winner: $SCIJX

Fund Size Comparison

One place these two funds differ is in their total assets under management. This is a good indication of how many other investors trust this fund. A large fund by itself doesn't mean it's a good fund, but it is one thing to consider when figuring out how to choose the right fund.

In the case of these two funds, NWHVX is a small fund with 551 Million in assets under management. SCIJX, on the other hand, is a medium fund with 601 Million in assets under management.

Winner: $SCIJX, Hartford Schroders International Stock Fund Class SDR

Which Should You Choose? NWHVX or SCIJX?

Comparing these two funds isn't an apples to apples comparison. NWHVX is a US Stocks Mid-Cap Growth fund, while SCIJX is a International Stocks Large Blend fund.

If you're aiming to build a diversified, low-fee, tax-optimized portfolio you likely won't be choosing between these two funds since they're different enough.

Running both of these funds through Minafi's FI Score algorithm, gives NWHVX a score of 33 and SCIJX a score of 55.

Winner: Neither, I'd research more funds if you're looking to invest for retirement.

$NWHVX

Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund Class A

33

Read More
Ratings
Rating Type Rating
Expense Ratio Score 5 /10
Expense Rating 0 /10
Market Score 4 /10
Category Score 5 /10
Overview
Overview Details
Fund Type Mutual Fund
Inception Date Jan-4-1999
Exchange NMFQS
Expense Ratio 1.180%
Net Assets 551 Million
Yield 0.00%
Holdings
Description Info
Market US Stocks
Category Mid-Cap Growth
Sectors
  • Basic Materials 0.00%
  • Communication Services 0.00%
  • Consumer Cyclical 14.59%
  • Consumer Defensive 4.11%
  • Energy 0.00%
  • Financial Services 5.36%
  • Healthcare 16.81%
  • Industrials 17.19%
  • Real Estate 4.25%
  • Technology 37.69%
  • Utilities 0.00%
Regions
  • North America 100.00%

$SCIJX

Hartford Schroders International Stock Fund Class SDR

55

Read More
Ratings
Rating Type Rating
Expense Ratio Score 7 /10
Expense Rating 2 /10
Market Score 5 /10
Category Score 10 /10
Overview
Overview Details
Fund Type Mutual Fund
Inception Date Dec-20-1985
Exchange NMFQS
Expense Ratio 0.760%
Net Assets 601 Million
Yield 1.38%
Holdings
Description Info
Market International Stocks
Category Large Blend
Sectors
  • Basic Materials 1.74%
  • Communication Services 5.07%
  • Consumer Cyclical 18.35%
  • Consumer Defensive 9.69%
  • Energy 0.00%
  • Financial Services 12.25%
  • Healthcare 17.41%
  • Industrials 10.85%
  • Real Estate 2.11%
  • Technology 18.61%
  • Utilities 3.93%
Regions
  • Asia Developed 12.93%
  • Asia Emerging 9.65%
  • Australasia 1.65%
  • Europe Developed 46.81%
  • Japan 8.77%
  • Latin America 4.05%
  • North America 1.75%
  • United Kingdom 14.39%

Adam says: Learn how to confidently invest for retirement!

Join the Minafi Investor Bootcamp to see how.

This 10-course bootcamp starts at only $10 for everything!

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2024   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo