NMINX vs PFMDX Fund Comparison

A comparison between NMINX and PFMDX based on their expense ratio, growth, holdings and how well they match their benchmark performance.

Group Created with Sketch.

Minafi's Take on NMINX vs PFMDX

Here's an in depth look at the differences between Columbia Maryland Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund Class C ($NMINX) and Pacific Funds Small/Mid-Cap Advisor Class ($PFMDX).

To start off, here's a look at the basics of each fund. Keep an eye on the FI Score. That's a custom score from 0 to 100 that we generate based on how good this fund is for the casual investor. Most investors only need a handful of total funds in their portfolio. The higher the score, the more likely this is one of those few. Score alone isn't enough! Keep reading on to see how different (or perhaps similar) these two funds are.

15% FI Score
  • nminx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Columbia Maryland Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.54% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

45% FI Score
  • pfmdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Pacific Funds Small/Mid-Cap Advisor Class

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Both $NMINX and $PFMDX are categorized as Mutual Funds. Mutual funds are often offered by 401(k) platforms and are essentially the same as ETFs. Mutual funds are generally offered by an investment platform – Fidelity has Fidelity mutual funds, Vanguard has Vanguard mutual funds. Mutual funds are ideal for retirement investing since you can invest any amount. That allows you to invest every last cent and benefit from the market.

The biggest disadvantage of mutual funds is that you're usually limited to the funds on your investment platform. If you're investing on Fidelity, you'll want to pick Fidelity mutual funds (or any ETF). Same with Vanguard. Some platforms offer mutual funds from other platforms, but they may charge a purchse or redemption fee. I'd recommend using the same platform as your funds – or stick to ETFs.

To learn more about the difference between these two, you can read about the difference between ETFs and Mutual Funds.

When evaluating a fund, the first things I look at are:

  • What it invests in
  • How much it charges in fees
  • How large the fund is

Let's look into these criteria one by one and see if either of these funds stands out.

Fund Holdings Comparison

Minafi's FI Score algorithm takes into account the category and market. The more niche a fund is, the lower the score. This doesn't mean it's a worse fund, but it does mean you should stop and make sure this a fund you need to diversify your portfolio.

NMINX PFMDX
Market Score 0.8 /10 5.9 /10
Category Score 8.0 /10 5.0 /10
Total 8.8 10.9

A score of 10 means this is a solid market and category that almost every investor will want to have investments in. The lower the score, the more specific the investment. These scores are based on when most investors would add these funds to their portfolio. A score of 10 means that this fund (or one like it) belongs in a three-fund portfolio. The lower the score, the farther down in your portfolio a fund would go.

Winner: $PFMDX

Fee Comparison

Fees are one of the biggest killers of portfolio growth. The difference between a 2% fee and a 0.04% fee over 30 years can result in your portfolio having half the total value!

If you're just getting started investing and learning how fees impact your portfolio, I'd encourage you to read through my free investment course (specifically '2.2 - All About Fees') where I go over all the different types of fees you can be charged and how to lower them.

For these two funds, NMINX has an expense ratio of 1.54% while PFMDX has an expense ratio of 0.98%.

Winner: $PFMDX

Fund Size Comparison

One place these two funds differ is in their total assets under management. This is a good indication of how many other investors trust this fund. A large fund by itself doesn't mean it's a good fund, but it is one thing to consider when figuring out how to choose the right fund.

In the case of these two funds, NMINX is a small fund with 48.5 Million in assets under management. PFMDX, on the other hand, is a medium fund with 362 Million in assets under management.

Winner: $PFMDX, Pacific Funds Small/Mid-Cap Advisor Class

Which Should You Choose? NMINX or PFMDX?

Comparing these two funds isn't an apples to apples comparison. NMINX is a Bond Municipal Bond fund, while PFMDX is a US Stocks Small Blend fund.

If you're aiming to build a diversified, low-fee, tax-optimized portfolio you likely won't be choosing between these two funds since they're different enough.

Running both of these funds through Minafi's FI Score algorithm, gives NMINX a score of 15 and PFMDX a score of 45.

Winner: Neither, I'd research more funds if you're looking to invest for retirement.

$NMINX

Columbia Maryland Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund Class C

15

Read More
Ratings
Rating Type Rating
Expense Ratio Score 1 /10
Expense Rating 0 /10
Market Score 1 /10
Category Score 8 /10
Overview
Overview Details
Fund Type Mutual Fund
Inception Date Aug-31-1990
Exchange NMFQS
Expense Ratio 1.540%
Net Assets 48.5 Million
Yield 1.58%
Holdings
Description Info
Market Bond
Category Municipal Bond
Sectors
  • Advance Refunded 14.92%
  • Cash & Equivalents 0.00%
  • Education 14.83%
  • Health 19.18%
  • Housing 1.36%
  • Industrial 0.00%
  • Miscellaneous Revenue 20.70%
  • Municipal 99.89%
  • Other 0.11%
  • State and Local General Obligation 14.84%
  • Tobacco 0.00%
  • Transportation 5.69%
  • Utilities 2.22%
  • Water & Sewer 6.14%

$PFMDX

Pacific Funds Small/Mid-Cap Advisor Class

45

Read More
Ratings
Rating Type Rating
Expense Ratio Score 7 /10
Expense Rating 0 /10
Market Score 6 /10
Category Score 5 /10
Overview
Overview Details
Fund Type Mutual Fund
Inception Date Dec-31-2014
Exchange NMFQS
Expense Ratio 0.980%
Net Assets 362 Million
Yield 0.51%
Holdings
Description Info
Market US Stocks
Category Small Blend
Sectors
  • Basic Materials 3.06%
  • Communication Services 2.05%
  • Consumer Cyclical 11.38%
  • Consumer Defensive 5.29%
  • Energy 1.20%
  • Financial Services 10.27%
  • Healthcare 18.69%
  • Industrials 15.11%
  • Real Estate 8.77%
  • Technology 20.94%
  • Utilities 3.23%
Regions
  • North America 100.00%

Adam says: Learn how to confidently invest for retirement!

Join the Minafi Investor Bootcamp to see how.

This 10-course bootcamp starts at only $10 for everything!

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2024   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo