MCCAX vs PBDM Fund Comparison

A comparison between MCCAX and PBDM based on their expense ratio, growth, holdings and how well they match their benchmark performance.

Group Created with Sketch.

Minafi's Take on MCCAX vs PBDM

Here's an in depth look at the differences between MFS California Municipal Bond Fund Class C ($MCCAX) and Invesco PureBeta FTSE Developed ex-North America ETF ($PBDM).

To start off, here's a look at the basics of each fund. Keep an eye on the FI Score. That's a custom score from 0 to 100 that we generate based on how good this fund is for the casual investor. Most investors only need a handful of total funds in their portfolio. The higher the score, the more likely this is one of those few. Score alone isn't enough! Keep reading on to see how different (or perhaps similar) these two funds are.

29% FI Score
  • mccax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

MFS California Municipal Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

65% FI Score
  • pbdm
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Invesco PureBeta FTSE Developed ex-North America ETF

Expenses: 0.07% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

$MCCAX is classified as a Mutual Fund while $PBDM is classified as an ETF. Even though one of these is a mutual fund and the other is an ETF, that doesn't matter too much for their holdings. Both ETFs and mutual funds are just containers to hold lots of investments inside of them.

The biggest differences between these two is where they may be offered. ETFs are more widely availble from a larger number of investment apps and websites. Mutual funds, on the other hand, are generally offered by the platform they're issued by (Fidelity funds on Fidelity, Vanguard funds on Vanguard). Usually 401(k)'s will offer both ETFs and Mutual Funds. If you're investing outside of a 401(k), I'd recommend you verify the fees associated with ETF and mutual fund transactions. Some platforms charge an additional fee to purchase a mutual fund.

To learn more about the difference between these two, you can read about the difference between ETFs and Mutual Funds.

When evaluating a fund, the first things I look at are:

  • What it invests in
  • How much it charges in fees
  • How large the fund is

Let's look into these criteria one by one and see if either of these funds stands out.

Fund Holdings Comparison

Minafi's FI Score algorithm takes into account the category and market. The more niche a fund is, the lower the score. This doesn't mean it's a worse fund, but it does mean you should stop and make sure this a fund you need to diversify your portfolio.

MCCAX PBDM
Market Score 4.8 /10 0.1 /10
Category Score 8.0 /10 10.0 /10
Total 12.8 10.1

A score of 10 means this is a solid market and category that almost every investor will want to have investments in. The lower the score, the more specific the investment. These scores are based on when most investors would add these funds to their portfolio. A score of 10 means that this fund (or one like it) belongs in a three-fund portfolio. The lower the score, the farther down in your portfolio a fund would go.

Winner: $MCCAX

Fee Comparison

Fees are one of the biggest killers of portfolio growth. The difference between a 2% fee and a 0.04% fee over 30 years can result in your portfolio having half the total value!

If you're just getting started investing and learning how fees impact your portfolio, I'd encourage you to read through my free investment course (specifically '2.2 - All About Fees') where I go over all the different types of fees you can be charged and how to lower them.

For these two funds, MCCAX has an expense ratio of 1.60% while PBDM has an expense ratio of 0.07%.

Winner: $PBDM

Fund Size Comparison

Both MCCAX and PBDM have a similar number of assets under management. MCCAX has 566 Million in assets under management, while PBDM has 2.16 Million.

Minafi categorizes both of these funds as small funds. Fund size is a good indication of how many other investors trust this fund. A large fund by itself doesn't mean it's a good fund, but it is one thing to consider when figuring out how to choose the right fund.

Winner: tie

Which Should You Choose? MCCAX or PBDM?

Comparing these two funds isn't an apples to apples comparison. MCCAX is a Bond Municipal Bond fund, while PBDM is a International Stocks Large Blend fund.

If you're aiming to build a diversified, low-fee, tax-optimized portfolio you likely won't be choosing between these two funds since they're different enough.

Running both of these funds through Minafi's FI Score algorithm, gives MCCAX a score of 29 and PBDM a score of 65.

Winner: Neither, I'd research more funds if you're looking to invest for retirement.

$MCCAX

MFS California Municipal Bond Fund Class C

29

Read More
Ratings
Rating Type Rating
Expense Ratio Score 1 /10
Expense Rating 0 /10
Market Score 5 /10
Category Score 8 /10
Overview
Overview Details
Fund Type Mutual Fund
Inception Date Jun-18-1985
Exchange NMFQS
Expense Ratio 1.600%
Net Assets 566 Million
Yield 2.02%
Holdings
Description Info
Market Bond
Category Municipal Bond
Sectors
  • Advance Refunded 5.24%
  • Cash & Equivalents 3.11%
  • Education 12.19%
  • Health 14.25%
  • Housing 0.53%
  • Industrial 3.08%
  • Miscellaneous Revenue 9.18%
  • Municipal 99.44%
  • Other -2.55%
  • State and Local General Obligation 23.64%
  • Tobacco 2.47%
  • Transportation 14.27%
  • Utilities 7.08%
  • Water & Sewer 7.50%

$PBDM

Invesco PureBeta FTSE Developed ex-North America ETF

65

Read More
Ratings
Rating Type Rating
Diversification Score 9 /10
Expense Ratio Score 10 /10
Expense Rating 9 /10
Market Score 0 /10
Category Score 10 /10
Overview
Overview Details
Fund Type ETF
Exchange BATS
Expense Ratio 0.070%
Net Assets 2.16 Million
Yield 3.62%
Holdings
Description Info
Market International Stocks
Category Large Blend
Sectors
  • Basic Materials 7.25%
  • Communication Services 6.33%
  • Consumer Cyclicals 10.12%
  • Consumer Defensive 11.32%
  • Energy 3.66%
  • Financial Services 15.84%
  • Healthcare 13.97%
  • Industrials 14.57%
  • Real Estate 3.07%
  • Technology 10.14%
  • Utilities 3.73%
Regions
  • Africa/Middle East 0.50%
  • Asia Developed 8.87%
  • Asia Emerging 0.40%
  • Australasia 6.81%
  • Europe Developed 43.17%
  • Europe Emerging 0.33%
  • Japan 25.63%
  • Latin America 0.01%
  • North America 0.55%
  • United Kingdom 13.73%

Adam says: Learn how to confidently invest for retirement!

Join the Minafi Investor Bootcamp to see how.

This 10-course bootcamp starts at only $10 for everything!

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2024   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo