IWP vs WWNPX Fund Comparison

A comparison between IWP and WWNPX based on their expense ratio, growth, holdings and how well they match their benchmark performance.

Group Created with Sketch.

Minafi's Take on IWP vs WWNPX

Here's an in depth look at the differences between iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF ($IWP) and Kinetics Paradigm Fund No Load Class ($WWNPX).

To start off, here's a look at the basics of each fund. Keep an eye on the FI Score. That's a custom score from 0 to 100 that we generate based on how good this fund is for the casual investor. Most investors only need a handful of total funds in their portfolio. The higher the score, the more likely this is one of those few. Score alone isn't enough! Keep reading on to see how different (or perhaps similar) these two funds are.

77% FI Score
  • iwp
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF

Expenses: 0.24% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

27% FI Score
  • wwnpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Kinetics Paradigm Fund No Load Class

Expenses: 1.64% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

$IWP is classified as an ETF while $WWNPX is classified as a Mutual Fund. Even though one of these is a mutual fund and the other is an ETF, that doesn't matter too much for their holdings. Both ETFs and mutual funds are just containers to hold lots of investments inside of them.

The biggest differences between these two is where they may be offered. ETFs are more widely availble from a larger number of investment apps and websites. Mutual funds, on the other hand, are generally offered by the platform they're issued by (Fidelity funds on Fidelity, Vanguard funds on Vanguard). Usually 401(k)'s will offer both ETFs and Mutual Funds. If you're investing outside of a 401(k), I'd recommend you verify the fees associated with ETF and mutual fund transactions. Some platforms charge an additional fee to purchase a mutual fund.

To learn more about the difference between these two, you can read about the difference between ETFs and Mutual Funds.

When evaluating a fund, the first things I look at are:

  • What it invests in
  • How much it charges in fees
  • How large the fund is

Let's look into these criteria one by one and see if either of these funds stands out.

Fund Holdings Comparison

Both of these funds are US Stocks Mid-Cap Growth funds – which means they're likely both investing in about the same investments behind the scenes.

Minafi's FI Score algorithm takes into account the category and market. The more niche a fund is, the lower the score. This doesn't mean it's a worse fund, but it does mean you should stop and make sure this a fund you need to diversify your portfolio.

IWP WWNPX
Market Score 9.3 /10 4.3 /10
Category Score 5.0 /10 5.0 /10
Total 14.3 9.3

A score of 10 means this is a solid market and category that almost every investor will want to have investments in. The lower the score, the more specific the investment. These scores are based on when most investors would add these funds to their portfolio. A score of 10 means that this fund (or one like it) belongs in a three-fund portfolio. The lower the score, the farther down in your portfolio a fund would go.

Winner: $IWP

Fee Comparison

Fees are one of the biggest killers of portfolio growth. The difference between a 2% fee and a 0.04% fee over 30 years can result in your portfolio having half the total value!

If you're just getting started investing and learning how fees impact your portfolio, I'd encourage you to read through my free investment course (specifically '2.2 - All About Fees') where I go over all the different types of fees you can be charged and how to lower them.

For these two funds, IWP has an expense ratio of 0.24% while WWNPX has an expense ratio of 1.64%.

Winner: $IWP

Fund Size Comparison

One place these two funds differ is in their total assets under management. This is a good indication of how many other investors trust this fund. A large fund by itself doesn't mean it's a good fund, but it is one thing to consider when figuring out how to choose the right fund.

In the case of these two funds, IWP is a large fund with 12 Billion in assets under management. WWNPX, on the other hand, is a small fund with 589 Million in assets under management.

Winner: $IWP, iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF

Which Should You Choose? IWP or WWNPX?

Since both of these funds are US Stocks Mid-Cap Growth funds, you'll most likely only need to invest in one of these funds – not both. Running both of these funds through Minafi's FI Score algorithm, gives IWP a score of 77 and WWNPX a score of 27.

Neither of these funds has an FI Score above 90 – which is a red flag. I'd look into more funds to find one with a higher FI Score.

Winner: Neither, I'd research more funds if you're looking to invest for retirement.

$IWP

iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF

77

Read More
Ratings
Rating Type Rating
Diversification Score 5 /10
Expense Ratio Score 10 /10
Expense Rating 8 /10
Market Score 9 /10
Category Score 5 /10
Overview
Overview Details
Fund Type ETF
Inception Date Jul-17-2001
Exchange NYSE ARCA
Expense Ratio 0.240%
Net Assets 12 Billion
Yield 0.57%
Holdings
Description Info
Market US Stocks
Category Mid-Cap Growth
Sectors
  • Basic Materials 1.29%
  • Communication Services 5.23%
  • Consumer Cyclicals 13.63%
  • Consumer Defensive 5.21%
  • Energy 0.83%
  • Financial Services 4.25%
  • Healthcare 16.44%
  • Industrials 17.03%
  • Real Estate 3.47%
  • Technology 32.62%
  • Utilities 0.00%
Regions
  • Asia Emerging 0.66%
  • North America 99.31%
  • United Kingdom 0.03%

$WWNPX

Kinetics Paradigm Fund No Load Class

27

Read More
Ratings
Rating Type Rating
Expense Ratio Score 2 /10
Expense Rating 0 /10
Market Score 4 /10
Category Score 5 /10
Overview
Overview Details
Fund Type Mutual Fund
Inception Date Dec-31-1999
Exchange NMFQS
Expense Ratio 1.640%
Net Assets 589 Million
Yield 0.02%
Holdings
Description Info
Market US Stocks
Category Mid-Cap Growth
Sectors
  • Basic Materials 5.70%
  • Communication Services 16.50%
  • Consumer Cyclical 2.63%
  • Consumer Defensive 0.09%
  • Energy 38.90%
  • Financial Services 16.69%
  • Healthcare 0.00%
  • Industrials 6.09%
  • Real Estate 8.74%
  • Technology 4.22%
  • Utilities 0.44%
Regions
  • Europe Developed 0.17%
  • Japan 0.25%
  • Latin America 0.44%
  • North America 98.31%
  • United Kingdom 0.84%

Adam says: Learn how to confidently invest for retirement!

Join the Minafi Investor Bootcamp to see how.

This 10-course bootcamp starts at only $10 for everything!

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2022   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo