HNDL vs KBWD Fund Comparison

A comparison between HNDL and KBWD based on their expense ratio, growth, holdings and how well they match their benchmark performance.

Group Created with Sketch.

Minafi's Take on HNDL vs KBWD

Here's an in depth look at the differences between Strategy Shares Nasdaq 7 Handl Index ETF ($HNDL) and Invesco KBW High Dividend Yield Financial ETF ($KBWD).

To start off, here's a look at the basics of each fund. Keep an eye on the FI Score. That's a custom score from 0 to 100 that we generate based on how good this fund is for the casual investor. Most investors only need a handful of total funds in their portfolio. The higher the score, the more likely this is one of those few. Score alone isn't enough! Keep reading on to see how different (or perhaps similar) these two funds are.

13% FI Score
  • hndl
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Strategy Shares Nasdaq 7 Handl Index ETF

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

29% FI Score
  • kbwd
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

Invesco KBW High Dividend Yield Financial ETF

Expenses: 1.58% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Both $HNDL and $KBWD are categorized as ETFs. ETFs have an added bonus over mutual funds of being more widely available. Mutual funds are often limited to only the issuing investment brokerage. Since these are both ETFs, you may be able to find these at a wider number of investment apps and websites.

The biggest disadvantage of ETFs is that some platforms only allow you to purchase ETFs in whole shares. So if an ETF is going for $75, you may need to invest in increments of $75. Most 401(k)'s allow for investing down to the penny, but you'll want to verify your platform allows for "fractional ETF Shares".

To learn more about the difference between these two, you can read about the difference between ETFs and Mutual Funds.

When evaluating a fund, the first things I look at are:

  • What it invests in
  • How much it charges in fees
  • How large the fund is

Let's look into these criteria one by one and see if either of these funds stands out.

Fund Holdings Comparison

Minafi's FI Score algorithm takes into account the category and market. The more niche a fund is, the lower the score. This doesn't mean it's a worse fund, but it does mean you should stop and make sure this a fund you need to diversify your portfolio.

HNDL KBWD
Market Score 0.6 /10 6.4 /10
Category Score 5.0 /10 0.0 /10
Total 5.6 6.4

A score of 10 means this is a solid market and category that almost every investor will want to have investments in. The lower the score, the more specific the investment. These scores are based on when most investors would add these funds to their portfolio. A score of 10 means that this fund (or one like it) belongs in a three-fund portfolio. The lower the score, the farther down in your portfolio a fund would go.

For each fund we've created a "diversification score" – a metric to indicate how closely each funds asset allocation matches it's benchmark. For example, an S&P 500 fund would have a diversification score of 10 if it's fully in line with the actual S&P 500.

The diversification score for HNDL is 0.1/10, while KBWD has a diversification score of 0.0/10.

In other words, HNDL more closely matches it's benchmark.

Winner: $KBWD

Fee Comparison

Fees are one of the biggest killers of portfolio growth. The difference between a 2% fee and a 0.04% fee over 30 years can result in your portfolio having half the total value!

If you're just getting started investing and learning how fees impact your portfolio, I'd encourage you to read through my free investment course (specifically '2.2 - All About Fees') where I go over all the different types of fees you can be charged and how to lower them.

For these two funds, HNDL has an expense ratio of 1.20% while KBWD has an expense ratio of 1.58%. In this case, both of these funds have a similar fee.

Winner: $HNDL (barely)

Fund Size Comparison

One place these two funds differ is in their total assets under management. This is a good indication of how many other investors trust this fund. A large fund by itself doesn't mean it's a good fund, but it is one thing to consider when figuring out how to choose the right fund.

In the case of these two funds, HNDL is a small fund with 19.1 Million in assets under management. KBWD, on the other hand, is a medium fund with 200 Million in assets under management.

Winner: $KBWD, Invesco KBW High Dividend Yield Financial ETF

Which Should You Choose? HNDL or KBWD?

Comparing these two funds isn't an apples to apples comparison. HNDL is a Allocation All-In-One fund, while KBWD is a Sector Equity Financial Services fund.

If you're aiming to build a diversified, low-fee, tax-optimized portfolio you likely won't be choosing between these two funds since they're different enough.

Running both of these funds through Minafi's FI Score algorithm, gives HNDL a score of 13 and KBWD a score of 29.

Winner: Neither, I'd research more funds if you're looking to invest for retirement.

$HNDL

Strategy Shares Nasdaq 7 Handl Index ETF

13

Read More
Ratings
Rating Type Rating
Diversification Score 0 /10
Expense Ratio Score 3 /10
Expense Rating 0 /10
Market Score 1 /10
Category Score 5 /10
Overview
Overview Details
Fund Type ETF
Exchange NASDAQ
Expense Ratio 1.200%
Net Assets 19.1 Million
Yield 7.04%
Holdings
Description Info
Market Allocation
Category All-In-One
Sectors
  • Basic Materials 1.11%
  • Communication Services 14.43%
  • Consumer Cyclicals 12.56%
  • Consumer Defensive 5.61%
  • Energy 4.32%
  • Financial Services 6.43%
  • Healthcare 10.04%
  • Industrials 5.39%
  • Real Estate 3.59%
  • Technology 30.70%
  • Utilities 5.82%
Regions
  • Africa/Middle East 0.08%
  • Asia Developed 0.02%
  • Asia Emerging 0.83%
  • Europe Developed 0.28%
  • Europe Emerging 0.01%
  • Latin America 0.23%
  • North America 98.26%
  • United Kingdom 0.29%

$KBWD

Invesco KBW High Dividend Yield Financial ETF

29

Read More
Ratings
Rating Type Rating
Diversification Score 0 /10
Expense Ratio Score 2 /10
Expense Rating 0 /10
Market Score 6 /10
Category Score 0 /10
Overview
Overview Details
Fund Type ETF
Inception Date Dec-2-2010
Exchange NASDAQ
Expense Ratio 1.580%
Net Assets 200 Million
Yield 14.64%
Holdings
Description Info
Market Sector Equity
Category Financial Services
Sectors
  • Basic Materials 0.00%
  • Communication Services 0.00%
  • Consumer Cyclicals 0.00%
  • Consumer Defensive 0.00%
  • Energy 0.00%
  • Financial Services 69.68%
  • Healthcare 0.00%
  • Industrials 1.93%
  • Real Estate 28.39%
  • Technology 0.00%
  • Utilities 0.00%
Regions
  • North America 100.00%

Adam says: Learn how to confidently invest for retirement!

Join the Minafi Investor Bootcamp to see how.

This 10-course bootcamp starts at only $10 for everything!

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2024   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo