HLMNX vs JPNL Fund Comparison

A comparison between HLMNX and JPNL based on their expense ratio, growth, holdings and how well they match their benchmark performance.

Group Created with Sketch.

Minafi's Take on HLMNX vs JPNL

Here's an in depth look at the differences between Harding Loevner International Equity Portfolio Investor Class ($HLMNX) and Direxion Daily Japan Bull 3X Shares ($JPNL).

To start off, here's a look at the basics of each fund. Keep an eye on the FI Score. That's a custom score from 0 to 100 that we generate based on how good this fund is for the casual investor. Most investors only need a handful of total funds in their portfolio. The higher the score, the more likely this is one of those few. Score alone isn't enough! Keep reading on to see how different (or perhaps similar) these two funds are.

57% FI Score
  • hlmnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Harding Loevner International Equity Portfolio Investor Class

Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

20% FI Score
  • jpnl
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

Direxion Daily Japan Bull 3X Shares

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

$HLMNX is classified as a Mutual Fund while $JPNL is classified as an ETF. Even though one of these is a mutual fund and the other is an ETF, that doesn't matter too much for their holdings. Both ETFs and mutual funds are just containers to hold lots of investments inside of them.

The biggest differences between these two is where they may be offered. ETFs are more widely availble from a larger number of investment apps and websites. Mutual funds, on the other hand, are generally offered by the platform they're issued by (Fidelity funds on Fidelity, Vanguard funds on Vanguard). Usually 401(k)'s will offer both ETFs and Mutual Funds. If you're investing outside of a 401(k), I'd recommend you verify the fees associated with ETF and mutual fund transactions. Some platforms charge an additional fee to purchase a mutual fund.

To learn more about the difference between these two, you can read about the difference between ETFs and Mutual Funds.

When evaluating a fund, the first things I look at are:

  • What it invests in
  • How much it charges in fees
  • How large the fund is

Let's look into these criteria one by one and see if either of these funds stands out.

Fund Holdings Comparison

Minafi's FI Score algorithm takes into account the category and market. The more niche a fund is, the lower the score. This doesn't mean it's a worse fund, but it does mean you should stop and make sure this a fund you need to diversify your portfolio.

HLMNX JPNL
Market Score 9.5 /10 2.2 /10
Category Score 8.0 /10 0.0 /10
Total 17.5 2.2

A score of 10 means this is a solid market and category that almost every investor will want to have investments in. The lower the score, the more specific the investment. These scores are based on when most investors would add these funds to their portfolio. A score of 10 means that this fund (or one like it) belongs in a three-fund portfolio. The lower the score, the farther down in your portfolio a fund would go.

Winner: $HLMNX

Fee Comparison

Fees are one of the biggest killers of portfolio growth. The difference between a 2% fee and a 0.04% fee over 30 years can result in your portfolio having half the total value!

If you're just getting started investing and learning how fees impact your portfolio, I'd encourage you to read through my free investment course (specifically '2.2 - All About Fees') where I go over all the different types of fees you can be charged and how to lower them.

For these two funds, HLMNX has an expense ratio of 1.13% while JPNL has an expense ratio of 1.24%. In this case, both of these funds have a similar fee.

Winner: $HLMNX (barely)

Fund Size Comparison

One place these two funds differ is in their total assets under management. This is a good indication of how many other investors trust this fund. A large fund by itself doesn't mean it's a good fund, but it is one thing to consider when figuring out how to choose the right fund.

In the case of these two funds, HLMNX is a large fund with 14.2 Billion in assets under management. JPNL, on the other hand, is a small fund with 6.47 Million in assets under management.

Winner: $HLMNX, Harding Loevner International Equity Portfolio Investor Class

Which Should You Choose? HLMNX or JPNL?

Comparing these two funds isn't an apples to apples comparison. HLMNX is a International Stocks Large Growth fund, while JPNL is a Alternative Leveraged Equities fund.

If you're aiming to build a diversified, low-fee, tax-optimized portfolio you likely won't be choosing between these two funds since they're different enough.

Running both of these funds through Minafi's FI Score algorithm, gives HLMNX a score of 57 and JPNL a score of 20.

Winner: Neither, I'd research more funds if you're looking to invest for retirement.

$HLMNX

Harding Loevner International Equity Portfolio Investor Class

57

Read More
Ratings
Rating Type Rating
Expense Ratio Score 5 /10
Expense Rating 0 /10
Market Score 10 /10
Category Score 8 /10
Overview
Overview Details
Fund Type Mutual Fund
Inception Date May-11-1994
Exchange NMFQS
Expense Ratio 1.130%
Net Assets 14.2 Billion
Yield 1.40%
Holdings
Description Info
Market International Stocks
Category Large Growth
Sectors
  • Basic Materials 7.28%
  • Communication Services 6.42%
  • Consumer Cyclical 2.65%
  • Consumer Defensive 16.85%
  • Energy 3.20%
  • Financial Services 15.62%
  • Healthcare 12.80%
  • Industrials 14.10%
  • Real Estate 0.00%
  • Technology 21.09%
  • Utilities 0.00%
Regions
  • Africa/Middle East 1.64%
  • Asia Developed 13.13%
  • Asia Emerging 9.35%
  • Europe Developed 43.97%
  • Europe Emerging 2.52%
  • Japan 14.53%
  • Latin America 2.74%
  • North America 3.15%
  • United Kingdom 8.97%

$JPNL

Direxion Daily Japan Bull 3X Shares

20

Read More
Ratings
Rating Type Rating
Expense Ratio Score 5 /10
Expense Rating 0 /10
Market Score 2 /10
Category Score 0 /10
Overview
Overview Details
Fund Type ETF
Inception Date Jun-26-2013
Exchange NYSE ARCA
Expense Ratio 1.240%
Net Assets 6.47 Million
Yield 1.28%
Holdings
Description Info
Market Alternative
Category Leveraged Equities
Sectors
  • Basic Materials 5.24%
  • Communication Services 8.30%
  • Consumer Cyclicals 15.81%
  • Consumer Defensive 7.36%
  • Energy 1.65%
  • Financial Services 10.83%
  • Healthcare 10.32%
  • Industrials 21.73%
  • Real Estate 4.15%
  • Technology 13.01%
  • Utilities 1.60%
Regions
  • Japan 100.00%

Adam says: Learn how to confidently invest for retirement!

Join the Minafi Investor Bootcamp to see how.

This 10-course bootcamp starts at only $10 for everything!

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2024   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo