GSAKX vs MSIBX Fund Comparison

A comparison between GSAKX and MSIBX based on their expense ratio, growth, holdings and how well they match their benchmark performance.

Group Created with Sketch.

Minafi's Take on GSAKX vs MSIBX

Here's an in depth look at the differences between Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A ($GSAKX) and Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Active International Allocation Portfolio Class A ($MSIBX).

To start off, here's a look at the basics of each fund. Keep an eye on the FI Score. That's a custom score from 0 to 100 that we generate based on how good this fund is for the casual investor. Most investors only need a handful of total funds in their portfolio. The higher the score, the more likely this is one of those few. Score alone isn't enough! Keep reading on to see how different (or perhaps similar) these two funds are.

24% FI Score
  • gsakx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

31% FI Score
  • msibx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Active International Allocation Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Both $GSAKX and $MSIBX are categorized as Mutual Funds. Mutual funds are often offered by 401(k) platforms and are essentially the same as ETFs. Mutual funds are generally offered by an investment platform – Fidelity has Fidelity mutual funds, Vanguard has Vanguard mutual funds. Mutual funds are ideal for retirement investing since you can invest any amount. That allows you to invest every last cent and benefit from the market.

The biggest disadvantage of mutual funds is that you're usually limited to the funds on your investment platform. If you're investing on Fidelity, you'll want to pick Fidelity mutual funds (or any ETF). Same with Vanguard. Some platforms offer mutual funds from other platforms, but they may charge a purchse or redemption fee. I'd recommend using the same platform as your funds – or stick to ETFs.

To learn more about the difference between these two, you can read about the difference between ETFs and Mutual Funds.

When evaluating a fund, the first things I look at are:

  • What it invests in
  • How much it charges in fees
  • How large the fund is

Let's look into these criteria one by one and see if either of these funds stands out.

Fund Holdings Comparison

Both of these funds are International Stocks Large Blend funds – which means they're likely both investing in about the same investments behind the scenes.

Minafi's FI Score algorithm takes into account the category and market. The more niche a fund is, the lower the score. This doesn't mean it's a worse fund, but it does mean you should stop and make sure this a fund you need to diversify your portfolio.

GSAKX MSIBX
Market Score 1.5 /10 3.2 /10
Category Score 10.0 /10 10.0 /10
Total 11.5 13.2

A score of 10 means this is a solid market and category that almost every investor will want to have investments in. The lower the score, the more specific the investment. These scores are based on when most investors would add these funds to their portfolio. A score of 10 means that this fund (or one like it) belongs in a three-fund portfolio. The lower the score, the farther down in your portfolio a fund would go.

Winner: $MSIBX

Fee Comparison

Fees are one of the biggest killers of portfolio growth. The difference between a 2% fee and a 0.04% fee over 30 years can result in your portfolio having half the total value!

If you're just getting started investing and learning how fees impact your portfolio, I'd encourage you to read through my free investment course (specifically '2.2 - All About Fees') where I go over all the different types of fees you can be charged and how to lower them.

For these two funds, GSAKX has an expense ratio of 1.25% while MSIBX has an expense ratio of 1.22%. In this case, both of these funds have a similar fee.

Winner: $MSIBX (barely)

Fund Size Comparison

Both GSAKX and MSIBX have a similar number of assets under management. GSAKX has 65.1 Million in assets under management, while MSIBX has 160 Million.

Minafi categorizes both of these funds as small funds. Fund size is a good indication of how many other investors trust this fund. A large fund by itself doesn't mean it's a good fund, but it is one thing to consider when figuring out how to choose the right fund.

Winner: tie

Which Should You Choose? GSAKX or MSIBX?

Since both of these funds are International Stocks Large Blend funds, you'll most likely only need to invest in one of these funds – not both. Running both of these funds through Minafi's FI Score algorithm, gives GSAKX a score of 24 and MSIBX a score of 31.

Since both of these have a similar FI Score, the difference between these two if minimal. A higher FI Score doesn't mean future growth will be higher, but it does mean that it better fits criteria for a good fund. Neither of these funds has an FI Score above 90 – which is a red flag. I'd look into more funds to find one with a higher FI Score.

Winner: Neither, I'd research more funds if you're looking to invest for retirement.

$GSAKX

Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A

24

Read More
Ratings
Rating Type Rating
Expense Ratio Score 3 /10
Expense Rating 0 /10
Market Score 1 /10
Category Score 10 /10
Overview
Overview Details
Fund Type Mutual Fund
Inception Date Jun-25-2007
Exchange NMFQS
Expense Ratio 1.250%
Net Assets 65.1 Million
Yield 3.12%
Holdings
Description Info
Market International Stocks
Category Large Blend
Sectors
  • Basic Materials 4.18%
  • Communication Services 2.80%
  • Consumer Cyclical 2.80%
  • Consumer Defensive 11.65%
  • Energy 6.49%
  • Financial Services 22.64%
  • Healthcare 16.33%
  • Industrials 12.74%
  • Real Estate 8.43%
  • Technology 3.34%
  • Utilities 8.61%
Regions
  • Asia Developed 8.16%
  • Australasia 1.63%
  • Europe Developed 51.51%
  • Japan 5.26%
  • North America 2.14%
  • United Kingdom 31.30%

$MSIBX

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Active International Allocation Portfolio Class A

31

Read More
Ratings
Rating Type Rating
Expense Ratio Score 3 /10
Expense Rating 0 /10
Market Score 3 /10
Category Score 10 /10
Overview
Overview Details
Fund Type Mutual Fund
Inception Date Jan-17-1992
Exchange NMFQS
Expense Ratio 1.220%
Net Assets 160 Million
Yield 1.03%
Holdings
Description Info
Market International Stocks
Category Large Blend
Sectors
  • Basic Materials 7.93%
  • Communication Services 14.85%
  • Consumer Cyclical 8.78%
  • Consumer Defensive 16.38%
  • Energy 2.55%
  • Financial Services 3.53%
  • Healthcare 14.21%
  • Industrials 8.78%
  • Real Estate 0.04%
  • Technology 22.80%
  • Utilities 0.16%
Regions
  • Asia Developed 12.06%
  • Asia Emerging 11.16%
  • Europe Developed 38.15%
  • Japan 9.72%
  • Latin America 2.74%
  • North America 17.22%
  • United Kingdom 8.94%

Adam says: Learn how to confidently invest for retirement!

Join the Minafi Investor Bootcamp to see how.

This 10-course bootcamp starts at only $10 for everything!

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2024   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo