GEM vs MRGR Fund Comparison

A comparison between GEM and MRGR based on their expense ratio, growth, holdings and how well they match their benchmark performance.

Group Created with Sketch.

Minafi's Take on GEM vs MRGR

Here's an in depth look at the differences between Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF ($GEM) and ProShares Merger ETF ($MRGR).

To start off, here's a look at the basics of each fund. Keep an eye on the FI Score. That's a custom score from 0 to 100 that we generate based on how good this fund is for the casual investor. Most investors only need a handful of total funds in their portfolio. The higher the score, the more likely this is one of those few. Score alone isn't enough! Keep reading on to see how different (or perhaps similar) these two funds are.

72% FI Score
  • gem
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

34% FI Score
  • mrgr
  • ETF
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

ProShares Merger ETF

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Both $GEM and $MRGR are categorized as ETFs. ETFs have an added bonus over mutual funds of being more widely available. Mutual funds are often limited to only the issuing investment brokerage. Since these are both ETFs, you may be able to find these at a wider number of investment apps and websites.

The biggest disadvantage of ETFs is that some platforms only allow you to purchase ETFs in whole shares. So if an ETF is going for $75, you may need to invest in increments of $75. Most 401(k)'s allow for investing down to the penny, but you'll want to verify your platform allows for "fractional ETF Shares".

To learn more about the difference between these two, you can read about the difference between ETFs and Mutual Funds.

When evaluating a fund, the first things I look at are:

  • What it invests in
  • How much it charges in fees
  • How large the fund is

Let's look into these criteria one by one and see if either of these funds stands out.

Fund Holdings Comparison

Minafi's FI Score algorithm takes into account the category and market. The more niche a fund is, the lower the score. This doesn't mean it's a worse fund, but it does mean you should stop and make sure this a fund you need to diversify your portfolio.

GEM MRGR
Market Score 7.7 /10 1.0 /10
Category Score 5.0 /10 0.0 /10
Total 12.7 1.0

A score of 10 means this is a solid market and category that almost every investor will want to have investments in. The lower the score, the more specific the investment. These scores are based on when most investors would add these funds to their portfolio. A score of 10 means that this fund (or one like it) belongs in a three-fund portfolio. The lower the score, the farther down in your portfolio a fund would go.

For each fund we've created a "diversification score" – a metric to indicate how closely each funds asset allocation matches it's benchmark. For example, an S&P 500 fund would have a diversification score of 10 if it's fully in line with the actual S&P 500.

The diversification score for GEM is 7.7/10, while MRGR has a diversification score of 0.0/10.

In other words, GEM more closely matches it's benchmark.

Winner: $GEM

Fee Comparison

Fees are one of the biggest killers of portfolio growth. The difference between a 2% fee and a 0.04% fee over 30 years can result in your portfolio having half the total value!

If you're just getting started investing and learning how fees impact your portfolio, I'd encourage you to read through my free investment course (specifically '2.2 - All About Fees') where I go over all the different types of fees you can be charged and how to lower them.

For these two funds, GEM has an expense ratio of 0.45% while MRGR has an expense ratio of 0.75%. In this case, both of these funds have a similar fee.

Winner: $GEM (barely)

Fund Size Comparison

One place these two funds differ is in their total assets under management. This is a good indication of how many other investors trust this fund. A large fund by itself doesn't mean it's a good fund, but it is one thing to consider when figuring out how to choose the right fund.

In the case of these two funds, GEM is a large fund with 1.6 Billion in assets under management. MRGR, on the other hand, is a small fund with 7.53 Million in assets under management.

Winner: $GEM, Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF

Which Should You Choose? GEM or MRGR?

Comparing these two funds isn't an apples to apples comparison. GEM is a International Stocks Emerging Markets fund, while MRGR is a Alternatives Neutral fund.

If you're aiming to build a diversified, low-fee, tax-optimized portfolio you likely won't be choosing between these two funds since they're different enough.

Running both of these funds through Minafi's FI Score algorithm, gives GEM a score of 72 and MRGR a score of 34.

Winner: Neither, I'd research more funds if you're looking to invest for retirement.

$GEM

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF

72

Read More
Ratings
Rating Type Rating
Diversification Score 8 /10
Expense Ratio Score 9 /10
Expense Rating 6 /10
Market Score 8 /10
Category Score 5 /10
Overview
Overview Details
Fund Type ETF
Inception Date Sep-25-2015
Exchange NYSE ARCA
Expense Ratio 0.450%
Net Assets 1.6 Billion
Yield 3.07%
Holdings
Description Info
Market International Stocks
Category Emerging Markets
Sectors
  • Basic Materials 5.10%
  • Communication Services 14.27%
  • Consumer Cyclicals 14.53%
  • Consumer Defensive 11.64%
  • Energy 5.08%
  • Financial Services 20.13%
  • Healthcare 4.15%
  • Industrials 2.57%
  • Real Estate 1.08%
  • Technology 18.26%
  • Utilities 3.18%
Regions
  • Africa/Middle East 7.88%
  • Asia Developed 29.04%
  • Asia Emerging 46.58%
  • Europe Developed 0.40%
  • Europe Emerging 6.14%
  • Latin America 9.79%
  • North America 0.17%

$MRGR

ProShares Merger ETF

34

Read More
Ratings
Rating Type Rating
Diversification Score 0 /10
Expense Ratio Score 10 /10
Expense Rating 3 /10
Market Score 1 /10
Category Score 0 /10
Overview
Overview Details
Fund Type ETF
Inception Date Aug-31-2016
Exchange BATS
Expense Ratio 0.750%
Net Assets 7.53 Million
Yield 0.79%
Holdings
Description Info
Market Alternatives
Category Neutral
Sectors
  • Basic Materials 0.00%
  • Communication Services 0.00%
  • Consumer Cyclicals 13.96%
  • Consumer Defensive 0.00%
  • Energy 0.00%
  • Financial Services 18.82%
  • Healthcare 15.95%
  • Industrials 5.08%
  • Real Estate 0.00%
  • Technology 41.02%
  • Utilities 5.17%
Regions
  • Europe Developed 15.12%
  • North America 75.00%
  • United Kingdom 9.88%

Adam says: Learn how to confidently invest for retirement!

Join the Minafi Investor Bootcamp to see how.

This 10-course bootcamp starts at only $10 for everything!

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2024   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo