FSHSX vs NHCCX Fund Comparison

A comparison between FSHSX and NHCCX based on their expense ratio, growth, holdings and how well they match their benchmark performance.

Group Created with Sketch.

Minafi's Take on FSHSX vs NHCCX

Here's an in depth look at the differences between Federated Short-Intermediate Duration Municipal Trust Service Shares ($FSHSX) and Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class C ($NHCCX).

To start off, here's a look at the basics of each fund. Keep an eye on the FI Score. That's a custom score from 0 to 100 that we generate based on how good this fund is for the casual investor. Most investors only need a handful of total funds in their portfolio. The higher the score, the more likely this is one of those few. Score alone isn't enough! Keep reading on to see how different (or perhaps similar) these two funds are.

52% FI Score
  • fshsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Federated Short-Intermediate Duration Municipal Trust Service Shares

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

50% FI Score
  • nhccx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.54% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Both $FSHSX and $NHCCX are categorized as Mutual Funds. Mutual funds are often offered by 401(k) platforms and are essentially the same as ETFs. Mutual funds are generally offered by an investment platform – Fidelity has Fidelity mutual funds, Vanguard has Vanguard mutual funds. Mutual funds are ideal for retirement investing since you can invest any amount. That allows you to invest every last cent and benefit from the market.

The biggest disadvantage of mutual funds is that you're usually limited to the funds on your investment platform. If you're investing on Fidelity, you'll want to pick Fidelity mutual funds (or any ETF). Same with Vanguard. Some platforms offer mutual funds from other platforms, but they may charge a purchse or redemption fee. I'd recommend using the same platform as your funds – or stick to ETFs.

To learn more about the difference between these two, you can read about the difference between ETFs and Mutual Funds.

When evaluating a fund, the first things I look at are:

  • What it invests in
  • How much it charges in fees
  • How large the fund is

Let's look into these criteria one by one and see if either of these funds stands out.

Fund Holdings Comparison

Both of these funds are Bond Municipal Bond funds – which means they're likely both investing in about the same investments behind the scenes.

Minafi's FI Score algorithm takes into account the category and market. The more niche a fund is, the lower the score. This doesn't mean it's a worse fund, but it does mean you should stop and make sure this a fund you need to diversify your portfolio.

FSHSX NHCCX
Market Score 5.4 /10 9.9 /10
Category Score 8.0 /10 8.0 /10
Total 13.4 17.9

A score of 10 means this is a solid market and category that almost every investor will want to have investments in. The lower the score, the more specific the investment. These scores are based on when most investors would add these funds to their portfolio. A score of 10 means that this fund (or one like it) belongs in a three-fund portfolio. The lower the score, the farther down in your portfolio a fund would go.

Winner: $NHCCX

Fee Comparison

Fees are one of the biggest killers of portfolio growth. The difference between a 2% fee and a 0.04% fee over 30 years can result in your portfolio having half the total value!

If you're just getting started investing and learning how fees impact your portfolio, I'd encourage you to read through my free investment course (specifically '2.2 - All About Fees') where I go over all the different types of fees you can be charged and how to lower them.

For these two funds, FSHSX has an expense ratio of 0.70% while NHCCX has an expense ratio of 1.54%.

Winner: $FSHSX

Fund Size Comparison

One place these two funds differ is in their total assets under management. This is a good indication of how many other investors trust this fund. A large fund by itself doesn't mean it's a good fund, but it is one thing to consider when figuring out how to choose the right fund.

In the case of these two funds, FSHSX is a medium fund with 754 Million in assets under management. NHCCX, on the other hand, is a large fund with 18.5 Billion in assets under management.

Winner: $NHCCX, Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class C

Which Should You Choose? FSHSX or NHCCX?

Since both of these funds are Bond Municipal Bond funds, you'll most likely only need to invest in one of these funds – not both. Running both of these funds through Minafi's FI Score algorithm, gives FSHSX a score of 52 and NHCCX a score of 50.

Since both of these have a similar FI Score, the difference between these two if minimal. A higher FI Score doesn't mean future growth will be higher, but it does mean that it better fits criteria for a good fund. Neither of these funds has an FI Score above 90 – which is a red flag. I'd look into more funds to find one with a higher FI Score.

Winner: Neither, I'd research more funds if you're looking to invest for retirement.

$FSHSX

Federated Short-Intermediate Duration Municipal Trust Service Shares

52

Read More
Ratings
Rating Type Rating
Expense Ratio Score 6 /10
Expense Rating 3 /10
Market Score 5 /10
Category Score 8 /10
Overview
Overview Details
Fund Type Mutual Fund
Inception Date Aug-20-1981
Exchange NMFQS
Expense Ratio 0.700%
Net Assets 754 Million
Yield 1.46%
Holdings
Description Info
Market Bond
Category Municipal Bond
Sectors
  • Advance Refunded 0.26%
  • Cash & Equivalents 0.26%
  • Education 7.60%
  • Health 20.62%
  • Housing 1.61%
  • Industrial 16.27%
  • Miscellaneous Revenue 0.96%
  • Municipal 99.74%
  • Other 0.00%
  • State and Local General Obligation 9.88%
  • Tobacco 1.15%
  • Transportation 15.86%
  • Utilities 20.01%
  • Water & Sewer 5.52%

$NHCCX

Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class C

50

Read More
Ratings
Rating Type Rating
Expense Ratio Score 1 /10
Expense Rating 0 /10
Market Score 10 /10
Category Score 8 /10
Overview
Overview Details
Fund Type Mutual Fund
Inception Date Jun-7-1999
Exchange NMFQS
Expense Ratio 1.540%
Net Assets 18.5 Billion
Yield 4.32%
Holdings
Description Info
Market Bond
Category Municipal Bond
Sectors
  • Advance Refunded 1.51%
  • Cash & Equivalents 1.68%
  • Education 12.67%
  • Health 12.17%
  • Housing 1.37%
  • Industrial 12.48%
  • Miscellaneous Revenue 17.52%
  • Municipal 92.57%
  • Other 1.37%
  • State and Local General Obligation 11.95%
  • Tobacco 5.27%
  • Transportation 8.61%
  • Utilities 5.65%
  • Water & Sewer 3.38%

Adam says: Learn how to confidently invest for retirement!

Join the Minafi Investor Bootcamp to see how.

This 10-course bootcamp starts at only $10 for everything!

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2024   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo