FLQH vs IGRO Fund Comparison

A comparison between FLQH and IGRO based on their expense ratio, growth, holdings and how well they match their benchmark performance.

Group Created with Sketch.

Minafi's Take on FLQH vs IGRO

Here's an in depth look at the differences between Franklin LibertyQ International Equity Hedged ETF ($FLQH) and iShares International Dividend Growth ETF ($IGRO).

To start off, here's a look at the basics of each fund. Keep an eye on the FI Score. That's a custom score from 0 to 100 that we generate based on how good this fund is for the casual investor. Most investors only need a handful of total funds in their portfolio. The higher the score, the more likely this is one of those few. Score alone isn't enough! Keep reading on to see how different (or perhaps similar) these two funds are.

48% FI Score
  • flqh
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Franklin LibertyQ International Equity Hedged ETF

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

60% FI Score
  • igro
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

iShares International Dividend Growth ETF

Expenses: 0.22% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Both $FLQH and $IGRO are categorized as ETFs. ETFs have an added bonus over mutual funds of being more widely available. Mutual funds are often limited to only the issuing investment brokerage. Since these are both ETFs, you may be able to find these at a wider number of investment apps and websites.

The biggest disadvantage of ETFs is that some platforms only allow you to purchase ETFs in whole shares. So if an ETF is going for $75, you may need to invest in increments of $75. Most 401(k)'s allow for investing down to the penny, but you'll want to verify your platform allows for "fractional ETF Shares".

To learn more about the difference between these two, you can read about the difference between ETFs and Mutual Funds.

When evaluating a fund, the first things I look at are:

  • What it invests in
  • How much it charges in fees
  • How large the fund is

Let's look into these criteria one by one and see if either of these funds stands out.

Fund Holdings Comparison

Both of these funds are International Stocks Large Blend funds – which means they're likely both investing in about the same investments behind the scenes.

Minafi's FI Score algorithm takes into account the category and market. The more niche a fund is, the lower the score. This doesn't mean it's a worse fund, but it does mean you should stop and make sure this a fund you need to diversify your portfolio.

FLQH IGRO
Market Score 0.5 /10 2.1 /10
Category Score 10.0 /10 10.0 /10
Total 10.5 12.1

A score of 10 means this is a solid market and category that almost every investor will want to have investments in. The lower the score, the more specific the investment. These scores are based on when most investors would add these funds to their portfolio. A score of 10 means that this fund (or one like it) belongs in a three-fund portfolio. The lower the score, the farther down in your portfolio a fund would go.

For each fund we've created a "diversification score" – a metric to indicate how closely each funds asset allocation matches it's benchmark. For example, an S&P 500 fund would have a diversification score of 10 if it's fully in line with the actual S&P 500.

The diversification score for FLQH is 0.0/10, while IGRO has a diversification score of 5.5/10.

In other words, IGRO more closely matches it's benchmark.

Winner: $IGRO

Fee Comparison

Fees are one of the biggest killers of portfolio growth. The difference between a 2% fee and a 0.04% fee over 30 years can result in your portfolio having half the total value!

If you're just getting started investing and learning how fees impact your portfolio, I'd encourage you to read through my free investment course (specifically '2.2 - All About Fees') where I go over all the different types of fees you can be charged and how to lower them.

For these two funds, FLQH has an expense ratio of 0.40% while IGRO has an expense ratio of 0.22%.

Winner: $IGRO

Fund Size Comparison

Both FLQH and IGRO have a similar number of assets under management. FLQH has 9.75 Million in assets under management, while IGRO has 80.2 Million.

Minafi categorizes both of these funds as small funds. Fund size is a good indication of how many other investors trust this fund. A large fund by itself doesn't mean it's a good fund, but it is one thing to consider when figuring out how to choose the right fund.

Winner: tie

Which Should You Choose? FLQH or IGRO?

Since both of these funds are International Stocks Large Blend funds, you'll most likely only need to invest in one of these funds – not both. Running both of these funds through Minafi's FI Score algorithm, gives FLQH a score of 48 and IGRO a score of 60.

Neither of these funds has an FI Score above 90 – which is a red flag. I'd look into more funds to find one with a higher FI Score.

Winner: Neither, I'd research more funds if you're looking to invest for retirement.

$FLQH

Franklin LibertyQ International Equity Hedged ETF

48

Read More
Ratings
Rating Type Rating
Diversification Score 0 /10
Expense Ratio Score 8 /10
Expense Rating 6 /10
Market Score 0 /10
Category Score 10 /10
Overview
Overview Details
Fund Type ETF
Inception Date Dec-1-2017
Exchange NYSE ARCA
Expense Ratio 0.400%
Net Assets 9.75 Million
Yield 0.78%
Holdings
Description Info
Market International Stocks
Category Large Blend
Sectors
  • Basic Materials 12.27%
  • Communication Services 12.23%
  • Consumer Cyclicals 14.17%
  • Consumer Defensive 16.79%
  • Energy 2.83%
  • Financial Services 5.20%
  • Healthcare 18.23%
  • Industrials 8.85%
  • Real Estate 2.08%
  • Technology 2.54%
  • Utilities 4.81%
Regions
  • Africa/Middle East 0.69%
  • Asia Developed 2.60%
  • Asia Emerging 0.14%
  • Australasia 13.79%
  • Europe Developed 31.77%
  • Japan 25.11%
  • North America 0.37%
  • United Kingdom 25.55%

$IGRO

iShares International Dividend Growth ETF

60

Read More
Ratings
Rating Type Rating
Diversification Score 6 /10
Expense Ratio Score 9 /10
Expense Rating 8 /10
Market Score 2 /10
Category Score 10 /10
Overview
Overview Details
Fund Type ETF
Exchange BATS
Expense Ratio 0.220%
Net Assets 80.2 Million
Yield 3.24%
Holdings
Description Info
Market International Stocks
Category Large Blend
Sectors
  • Basic Materials 6.87%
  • Communication Services 5.08%
  • Consumer Cyclicals 6.58%
  • Consumer Defensive 12.24%
  • Energy 3.86%
  • Financial Services 25.55%
  • Healthcare 11.10%
  • Industrials 13.49%
  • Real Estate 3.90%
  • Technology 8.17%
  • Utilities 3.14%
Regions
  • Africa/Middle East 1.20%
  • Asia Developed 6.86%
  • Asia Emerging 4.58%
  • Australasia 2.47%
  • Europe Developed 42.58%
  • Europe Emerging 0.48%
  • Japan 13.91%
  • Latin America 0.90%
  • North America 18.01%
  • United Kingdom 9.01%

Adam says: Learn how to confidently invest for retirement!

Join the Minafi Investor Bootcamp to see how.

This 10-course bootcamp starts at only $10 for everything!

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2024   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo