FFR vs LSHCX Fund Comparison

A comparison between FFR and LSHCX based on their expense ratio, growth, holdings and how well they match their benchmark performance.

Group Created with Sketch.

Minafi's Take on FFR vs LSHCX

Here's an in depth look at the differences between First Trust FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Markets Real Estate Index Fund ($FFR) and Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund Advisor Class C ($LSHCX).

To start off, here's a look at the basics of each fund. Keep an eye on the FI Score. That's a custom score from 0 to 100 that we generate based on how good this fund is for the casual investor. Most investors only need a handful of total funds in their portfolio. The higher the score, the more likely this is one of those few. Score alone isn't enough! Keep reading on to see how different (or perhaps similar) these two funds are.

48% FI Score
  • ffr
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

First Trust FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Markets Real Estate Index Fund

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

  • lshcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund Advisor Class C

Expenses: 2.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

$FFR is classified as an ETF while $LSHCX is classified as a Mutual Fund. Even though one of these is a mutual fund and the other is an ETF, that doesn't matter too much for their holdings. Both ETFs and mutual funds are just containers to hold lots of investments inside of them.

The biggest differences between these two is where they may be offered. ETFs are more widely availble from a larger number of investment apps and websites. Mutual funds, on the other hand, are generally offered by the platform they're issued by (Fidelity funds on Fidelity, Vanguard funds on Vanguard). Usually 401(k)'s will offer both ETFs and Mutual Funds. If you're investing outside of a 401(k), I'd recommend you verify the fees associated with ETF and mutual fund transactions. Some platforms charge an additional fee to purchase a mutual fund.

To learn more about the difference between these two, you can read about the difference between ETFs and Mutual Funds.

When evaluating a fund, the first things I look at are:

  • What it invests in
  • How much it charges in fees
  • How large the fund is

Let's look into these criteria one by one and see if either of these funds stands out.

Fund Holdings Comparison

Minafi's FI Score algorithm takes into account the category and market. The more niche a fund is, the lower the score. This doesn't mean it's a worse fund, but it does mean you should stop and make sure this a fund you need to diversify your portfolio.

FFR LSHCX
Market Score 1.7 /10 0.5 /10
Category Score 0.0 /10 5.0 /10
Total 1.7 5.5

A score of 10 means this is a solid market and category that almost every investor will want to have investments in. The lower the score, the more specific the investment. These scores are based on when most investors would add these funds to their portfolio. A score of 10 means that this fund (or one like it) belongs in a three-fund portfolio. The lower the score, the farther down in your portfolio a fund would go.

Winner: $LSHCX

Fee Comparison

Fees are one of the biggest killers of portfolio growth. The difference between a 2% fee and a 0.04% fee over 30 years can result in your portfolio having half the total value!

If you're just getting started investing and learning how fees impact your portfolio, I'd encourage you to read through my free investment course (specifically '2.2 - All About Fees') where I go over all the different types of fees you can be charged and how to lower them.

For these two funds, FFR has an expense ratio of 0.60% while LSHCX has an expense ratio of 2.25%.

Winner: $FFR

Fund Size Comparison

Both FFR and LSHCX have a similar number of assets under management. FFR has 38.9 Million in assets under management, while LSHCX has 14.8 Million.

Minafi categorizes both of these funds as small funds. Fund size is a good indication of how many other investors trust this fund. A large fund by itself doesn't mean it's a good fund, but it is one thing to consider when figuring out how to choose the right fund.

Winner: tie

Which Should You Choose? FFR or LSHCX?

Comparing these two funds isn't an apples to apples comparison. FFR is a Sector Equity Real Estate fund, while LSHCX is a US Stocks Mid-Cap Growth fund.

If you're aiming to build a diversified, low-fee, tax-optimized portfolio you likely won't be choosing between these two funds since they're different enough.

Running both of these funds through Minafi's FI Score algorithm, gives FFR a score of 48 and LSHCX a score of 8.

Winner: Neither, I'd research more funds if you're looking to invest for retirement.

$FFR

First Trust FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Markets Real Estate Index Fund

48

Read More
Ratings
Rating Type Rating
Diversification Score 9 /10
Expense Ratio Score 8 /10
Expense Rating 4 /10
Market Score 2 /10
Category Score 0 /10
Overview
Overview Details
Fund Type ETF
Inception Date Aug-27-2007
Exchange NYSE ARCA
Expense Ratio 0.600%
Net Assets 38.9 Million
Yield 5.93%
Holdings
Description Info
Market Sector Equity
Category Real Estate
Sectors
  • Basic Materials 0.00%
  • Communication Services 0.00%
  • Consumer Cyclicals 0.08%
  • Consumer Defensive 0.00%
  • Energy 0.00%
  • Financial Services 0.00%
  • Healthcare 0.00%
  • Industrials 0.00%
  • Real Estate 99.92%
  • Technology 0.00%
  • Utilities 0.00%
Regions
  • Africa/Middle East 0.19%
  • Asia Developed 9.66%
  • Australasia 3.60%
  • Europe Developed 13.47%
  • Japan 11.89%
  • North America 57.38%
  • United Kingdom 3.82%

$LSHCX

Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund Advisor Class C

8

Read More
Ratings
Rating Type Rating
Expense Ratio Score 0 /10
Expense Rating 0 /10
Market Score 1 /10
Category Score 5 /10
Overview
Overview Details
Fund Type Mutual Fund
Inception Date May-24-2007
Exchange NMFQS
Expense Ratio 2.250%
Net Assets 14.8 Million
Yield 0.00%
Holdings
Description Info
Market US Stocks
Category Mid-Cap Growth
Sectors
  • Basic Materials 0.05%
  • Communication Services 7.99%
  • Consumer Cyclical 0.24%
  • Consumer Defensive 4.18%
  • Energy 34.63%
  • Financial Services 20.21%
  • Healthcare 1.73%
  • Industrials 15.12%
  • Real Estate 15.85%
  • Technology 0.00%
  • Utilities 0.00%
Regions
  • Europe Developed 2.66%
  • North America 97.34%

Adam says: Learn how to confidently invest for retirement!

Join the Minafi Investor Bootcamp to see how.

This 10-course bootcamp starts at only $10 for everything!

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2024   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo