FFOPX vs SDEM Fund Comparison

A comparison between FFOPX and SDEM based on their expense ratio, growth, holdings and how well they match their benchmark performance.

Group Created with Sketch.

Minafi's Take on FFOPX vs SDEM

Here's an in depth look at the differences between Fidelity Freedom® Index 2050 Fund Institutional Premium Class ($FFOPX) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF ($SDEM).

To start off, here's a look at the basics of each fund. Keep an eye on the FI Score. That's a custom score from 0 to 100 that we generate based on how good this fund is for the casual investor. Most investors only need a handful of total funds in their portfolio. The higher the score, the more likely this is one of those few. Score alone isn't enough! Keep reading on to see how different (or perhaps similar) these two funds are.

82% FI Score
  • ffopx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Fidelity Freedom® Index 2050 Fund Institutional Premium Class

Expenses: 0.08% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

38% FI Score
  • sdem
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF

Expenses: 0.66% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

$FFOPX is classified as a Mutual Fund while $SDEM is classified as an ETF. Even though one of these is a mutual fund and the other is an ETF, that doesn't matter too much for their holdings. Both ETFs and mutual funds are just containers to hold lots of investments inside of them.

The biggest differences between these two is where they may be offered. ETFs are more widely availble from a larger number of investment apps and websites. Mutual funds, on the other hand, are generally offered by the platform they're issued by (Fidelity funds on Fidelity, Vanguard funds on Vanguard). Usually 401(k)'s will offer both ETFs and Mutual Funds. If you're investing outside of a 401(k), I'd recommend you verify the fees associated with ETF and mutual fund transactions. Some platforms charge an additional fee to purchase a mutual fund.

To learn more about the difference between these two, you can read about the difference between ETFs and Mutual Funds.

When evaluating a fund, the first things I look at are:

  • What it invests in
  • How much it charges in fees
  • How large the fund is

Let's look into these criteria one by one and see if either of these funds stands out.

Fund Holdings Comparison

Minafi's FI Score algorithm takes into account the category and market. The more niche a fund is, the lower the score. This doesn't mean it's a worse fund, but it does mean you should stop and make sure this a fund you need to diversify your portfolio.

FFOPX SDEM
Market Score 8.0 /10 1.0 /10
Category Score 5.0 /10 5.0 /10
Total 13.0 6.0

A score of 10 means this is a solid market and category that almost every investor will want to have investments in. The lower the score, the more specific the investment. These scores are based on when most investors would add these funds to their portfolio. A score of 10 means that this fund (or one like it) belongs in a three-fund portfolio. The lower the score, the farther down in your portfolio a fund would go.

Winner: $FFOPX

Fee Comparison

Fees are one of the biggest killers of portfolio growth. The difference between a 2% fee and a 0.04% fee over 30 years can result in your portfolio having half the total value!

If you're just getting started investing and learning how fees impact your portfolio, I'd encourage you to read through my free investment course (specifically '2.2 - All About Fees') where I go over all the different types of fees you can be charged and how to lower them.

For these two funds, FFOPX has an expense ratio of 0.08% while SDEM has an expense ratio of 0.66%. In this case, both of these funds have a similar fee.

Winner: $FFOPX (barely)

Fund Size Comparison

One place these two funds differ is in their total assets under management. This is a good indication of how many other investors trust this fund. A large fund by itself doesn't mean it's a good fund, but it is one thing to consider when figuring out how to choose the right fund.

In the case of these two funds, FFOPX is a large fund with 3.95 Billion in assets under management. SDEM, on the other hand, is a small fund with 15.6 Million in assets under management.

Winner: $FFOPX, Fidelity Freedom® Index 2050 Fund Institutional Premium Class

Which Should You Choose? FFOPX or SDEM?

Comparing these two funds isn't an apples to apples comparison. FFOPX is a Allocation Target-Date fund, while SDEM is a International Stocks Emerging Markets fund.

If you're aiming to build a diversified, low-fee, tax-optimized portfolio you likely won't be choosing between these two funds since they're different enough.

Running both of these funds through Minafi's FI Score algorithm, gives FFOPX a score of 82 and SDEM a score of 38.

Winner: Neither, I'd research more funds if you're looking to invest for retirement.

$FFOPX

Fidelity Freedom® Index 2050 Fund Institutional Premium Class

82

Read More
Ratings
Rating Type Rating
Expense Ratio Score 9 /10
Expense Rating 9 /10
Market Score 8 /10
Category Score 5 /10
Overview
Overview Details
Fund Type Mutual Fund
Inception Date Oct-2-2009
Exchange NMFQS
Expense Ratio 0.080%
Net Assets 3.95 Billion
Yield 1.70%
Holdings
Description Info
Market Allocation
Category Target-Date
Sectors
  • Basic Materials 3.98%
  • Communication Services 9.46%
  • Consumer Cyclical 9.99%
  • Consumer Defensive 8.62%
  • Energy 3.54%
  • Financial Services 15.90%
  • Healthcare 13.81%
  • Industrials 10.01%
  • Real Estate 3.68%
  • Technology 17.51%
  • Utilities 3.51%
Regions
  • Africa/Middle East 0.95%
  • Asia Developed 3.78%
  • Asia Emerging 5.74%
  • Australasia 1.55%
  • Europe Developed 11.62%
  • Europe Emerging 0.50%
  • Japan 6.53%
  • Latin America 0.84%
  • North America 64.41%
  • United Kingdom 4.09%

$SDEM

Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF

38

Read More
Ratings
Rating Type Rating
Diversification Score 0 /10
Expense Ratio Score 8 /10
Expense Rating 3 /10
Market Score 1 /10
Category Score 5 /10
Overview
Overview Details
Fund Type ETF
Inception Date Mar-16-2015
Exchange NYSE ARCA
Expense Ratio 0.660%
Net Assets 15.6 Million
Yield 9.16%
Holdings
Description Info
Market International Stocks
Category Emerging Markets
Sectors
  • Basic Materials 15.13%
  • Communication Services 4.05%
  • Consumer Cyclicals 0.00%
  • Consumer Defensive 2.07%
  • Energy 11.88%
  • Financial Services 24.10%
  • Healthcare 0.00%
  • Industrials 5.42%
  • Real Estate 21.33%
  • Technology 13.99%
  • Utilities 2.04%
Regions
  • Africa/Middle East 16.68%
  • Asia Developed 13.20%
  • Asia Emerging 27.35%
  • Europe Emerging 19.25%
  • Latin America 23.53%

Adam says: Learn how to confidently invest for retirement!

Join the Minafi Investor Bootcamp to see how.

This 10-course bootcamp starts at only $10 for everything!

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2024   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs up duo thumbs down duo