EPOL vs MGHBX Fund Comparison

A comparison between EPOL and MGHBX based on their expense ratio, growth, holdings and how well they match their benchmark performance.

Group Created with Sketch.

Minafi's Take on EPOL vs MGHBX

Here's an in depth look at the differences between iShares MSCI Poland ETF ($EPOL) and MainStay Candriam Emerging Markets Debt Fund Class B ($MGHBX).

To start off, here's a look at the basics of each fund. Keep an eye on the FI Score. That's a custom score from 0 to 100 that we generate based on how good this fund is for the casual investor. Most investors only need a handful of total funds in their portfolio. The higher the score, the more likely this is one of those few. Score alone isn't enough! Keep reading on to see how different (or perhaps similar) these two funds are.

54% FI Score
  • epol
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Other Region

iShares MSCI Poland ETF

Expenses: 0.61% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Other Region International Stocks fund. See why »

12% FI Score
  • mghbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

MainStay Candriam Emerging Markets Debt Fund Class B

Expenses: 2.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

$EPOL is classified as an ETF while $MGHBX is classified as a Mutual Fund. Even though one of these is a mutual fund and the other is an ETF, that doesn't matter too much for their holdings. Both ETFs and mutual funds are just containers to hold lots of investments inside of them.

The biggest differences between these two is where they may be offered. ETFs are more widely availble from a larger number of investment apps and websites. Mutual funds, on the other hand, are generally offered by the platform they're issued by (Fidelity funds on Fidelity, Vanguard funds on Vanguard). Usually 401(k)'s will offer both ETFs and Mutual Funds. If you're investing outside of a 401(k), I'd recommend you verify the fees associated with ETF and mutual fund transactions. Some platforms charge an additional fee to purchase a mutual fund.

To learn more about the difference between these two, you can read about the difference between ETFs and Mutual Funds.

When evaluating a fund, the first things I look at are:

  • What it invests in
  • How much it charges in fees
  • How large the fund is

Let's look into these criteria one by one and see if either of these funds stands out.

Fund Holdings Comparison

Minafi's FI Score algorithm takes into account the category and market. The more niche a fund is, the lower the score. This doesn't mean it's a worse fund, but it does mean you should stop and make sure this a fund you need to diversify your portfolio.

EPOL MGHBX
Market Score 8.0 /10 2.9 /10
Category Score 5.0 /10 0.0 /10
Total 13.0 2.9

A score of 10 means this is a solid market and category that almost every investor will want to have investments in. The lower the score, the more specific the investment. These scores are based on when most investors would add these funds to their portfolio. A score of 10 means that this fund (or one like it) belongs in a three-fund portfolio. The lower the score, the farther down in your portfolio a fund would go.

Winner: $EPOL

Fee Comparison

Fees are one of the biggest killers of portfolio growth. The difference between a 2% fee and a 0.04% fee over 30 years can result in your portfolio having half the total value!

If you're just getting started investing and learning how fees impact your portfolio, I'd encourage you to read through my free investment course (specifically '2.2 - All About Fees') where I go over all the different types of fees you can be charged and how to lower them.

For these two funds, EPOL has an expense ratio of 0.61% while MGHBX has an expense ratio of 2.27%. In this case, both of these funds have a similar fee.

Winner: $EPOL (barely)

Fund Size Comparison

One place these two funds differ is in their total assets under management. This is a good indication of how many other investors trust this fund. A large fund by itself doesn't mean it's a good fund, but it is one thing to consider when figuring out how to choose the right fund.

In the case of these two funds, EPOL is a large fund with 229 Million in assets under management. MGHBX, on the other hand, is a small fund with 111 Million in assets under management.

Winner: $EPOL, iShares MSCI Poland ETF

Which Should You Choose? EPOL or MGHBX?

Comparing these two funds isn't an apples to apples comparison. EPOL is a International Stocks Other Region fund, while MGHBX is a Bond High Yield Bond fund.

If you're aiming to build a diversified, low-fee, tax-optimized portfolio you likely won't be choosing between these two funds since they're different enough.

Running both of these funds through Minafi's FI Score algorithm, gives EPOL a score of 54 and MGHBX a score of 12.

Winner: Neither, I'd research more funds if you're looking to invest for retirement.

$EPOL

iShares MSCI Poland ETF

54

Read More
Ratings
Rating Type Rating
Diversification Score 0 /10
Expense Ratio Score 3 /10
Expense Rating 4 /10
Market Score 8 /10
Category Score 5 /10
Overview
Overview Details
Fund Type ETF
Inception Date May-25-2010
Exchange NYSE ARCA
Expense Ratio 0.610%
Net Assets 229 Million
Yield 3.23%
Holdings
Description Info
Market International Stocks
Category Other Region
Sectors
  • Basic Materials 6.37%
  • Communication Services 20.94%
  • Consumer Cyclicals 6.97%
  • Consumer Defensive 5.44%
  • Energy 17.19%
  • Financial Services 32.43%
  • Healthcare 0.75%
  • Industrials 1.73%
  • Real Estate 0.00%
  • Technology 2.21%
  • Utilities 5.96%
Regions
  • Europe Emerging 100.00%

$MGHBX

MainStay Candriam Emerging Markets Debt Fund Class B

12

Read More
Ratings
Rating Type Rating
Expense Ratio Score 0 /10
Expense Rating 0 /10
Market Score 3 /10
Category Score 0 /10
Overview
Overview Details
Fund Type Mutual Fund
Inception Date Jun-1-1998
Exchange NMFQS
Expense Ratio 2.270%
Net Assets 111 Million
Yield 4.11%
Holdings
Description Info
Market Bond
Category High Yield Bond
Sectors
  • Agency Mortgage-Backed 0.00%
  • Agency/Quasi-Agency 13.27%
  • Asset-Backed 0.00%
  • Bank Loan 0.00%
  • Cash & Equivalents 1.97%
  • Commercial MBS 0.00%
  • Convertible 0.00%
  • Corporate 19.48%
  • Corporate Bond 19.48%
  • Covered Bond 0.00%
  • Government 56.20%
  • Municipal 0.00%
  • Non-Agency Residential MBS 0.00%
  • Other 0.00%
  • Other Government Related 3.26%
  • Preferred 0.00%
  • Securitized 0.00%
  • Supranational 0.00%

Adam says: Learn how to confidently invest for retirement!

Join the Minafi Investor Bootcamp to see how.

This 10-course bootcamp starts at only $10 for everything!

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2024   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo