CCEPX vs MRGR Fund Comparison

A comparison between CCEPX and MRGR based on their expense ratio, growth, holdings and how well they match their benchmark performance.

Group Created with Sketch.

Minafi's Take on CCEPX vs MRGR

Here's an in depth look at the differences between American Beacon Continuous Capital Emerging Markets Fund Investor Class ($CCEPX) and ProShares Merger ETF ($MRGR).

To start off, here's a look at the basics of each fund. Keep an eye on the FI Score. That's a custom score from 0 to 100 that we generate based on how good this fund is for the casual investor. Most investors only need a handful of total funds in their portfolio. The higher the score, the more likely this is one of those few. Score alone isn't enough! Keep reading on to see how different (or perhaps similar) these two funds are.

16% FI Score
  • ccepx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

American Beacon Continuous Capital Emerging Markets Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

34% FI Score
  • mrgr
  • ETF
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

ProShares Merger ETF

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

$CCEPX is classified as a Mutual Fund while $MRGR is classified as an ETF. Even though one of these is a mutual fund and the other is an ETF, that doesn't matter too much for their holdings. Both ETFs and mutual funds are just containers to hold lots of investments inside of them.

The biggest differences between these two is where they may be offered. ETFs are more widely availble from a larger number of investment apps and websites. Mutual funds, on the other hand, are generally offered by the platform they're issued by (Fidelity funds on Fidelity, Vanguard funds on Vanguard). Usually 401(k)'s will offer both ETFs and Mutual Funds. If you're investing outside of a 401(k), I'd recommend you verify the fees associated with ETF and mutual fund transactions. Some platforms charge an additional fee to purchase a mutual fund.

To learn more about the difference between these two, you can read about the difference between ETFs and Mutual Funds.

When evaluating a fund, the first things I look at are:

  • What it invests in
  • How much it charges in fees
  • How large the fund is

Let's look into these criteria one by one and see if either of these funds stands out.

Fund Holdings Comparison

Minafi's FI Score algorithm takes into account the category and market. The more niche a fund is, the lower the score. This doesn't mean it's a worse fund, but it does mean you should stop and make sure this a fund you need to diversify your portfolio.

CCEPX MRGR
Market Score 0.6 /10 1.0 /10
Category Score 5.0 /10 0.0 /10
Total 5.6 1.0

A score of 10 means this is a solid market and category that almost every investor will want to have investments in. The lower the score, the more specific the investment. These scores are based on when most investors would add these funds to their portfolio. A score of 10 means that this fund (or one like it) belongs in a three-fund portfolio. The lower the score, the farther down in your portfolio a fund would go.

Winner: $CCEPX

Fee Comparison

Fees are one of the biggest killers of portfolio growth. The difference between a 2% fee and a 0.04% fee over 30 years can result in your portfolio having half the total value!

If you're just getting started investing and learning how fees impact your portfolio, I'd encourage you to read through my free investment course (specifically '2.2 - All About Fees') where I go over all the different types of fees you can be charged and how to lower them.

For these two funds, CCEPX has an expense ratio of 1.53% while MRGR has an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Winner: $MRGR

Fund Size Comparison

Both CCEPX and MRGR have a similar number of assets under management. CCEPX has 8.02 Million in assets under management, while MRGR has 7.53 Million.

Minafi categorizes both of these funds as small funds. Fund size is a good indication of how many other investors trust this fund. A large fund by itself doesn't mean it's a good fund, but it is one thing to consider when figuring out how to choose the right fund.

Winner: tie

Which Should You Choose? CCEPX or MRGR?

Comparing these two funds isn't an apples to apples comparison. CCEPX is a International Stocks Emerging Markets fund, while MRGR is a Alternatives Neutral fund.

If you're aiming to build a diversified, low-fee, tax-optimized portfolio you likely won't be choosing between these two funds since they're different enough.

Running both of these funds through Minafi's FI Score algorithm, gives CCEPX a score of 16 and MRGR a score of 34.

Winner: Neither, I'd research more funds if you're looking to invest for retirement.

$CCEPX

American Beacon Continuous Capital Emerging Markets Fund Investor Class

16

Read More
Ratings
Rating Type Rating
Expense Ratio Score 3 /10
Expense Rating 0 /10
Market Score 1 /10
Category Score 5 /10
Overview
Overview Details
Fund Type Mutual Fund
Inception Date Dec-17-2018
Exchange NMFQS
Expense Ratio 1.530%
Net Assets 8.02 Million
Yield 2.60%
Holdings
Description Info
Market International Stocks
Category Emerging Markets
Sectors
  • Basic Materials 2.29%
  • Communication Services 13.36%
  • Consumer Cyclical 6.65%
  • Consumer Defensive 14.04%
  • Energy 2.39%
  • Financial Services 13.34%
  • Healthcare 10.78%
  • Industrials 4.70%
  • Real Estate 4.39%
  • Technology 19.85%
  • Utilities 8.20%
Regions
  • Africa/Middle East 3.22%
  • Asia Developed 28.52%
  • Asia Emerging 52.37%
  • Europe Developed 0.91%
  • Europe Emerging 2.42%
  • Latin America 9.57%
  • North America 2.99%

$MRGR

ProShares Merger ETF

34

Read More
Ratings
Rating Type Rating
Diversification Score 0 /10
Expense Ratio Score 10 /10
Expense Rating 3 /10
Market Score 1 /10
Category Score 0 /10
Overview
Overview Details
Fund Type ETF
Inception Date Aug-31-2016
Exchange BATS
Expense Ratio 0.750%
Net Assets 7.53 Million
Yield 0.79%
Holdings
Description Info
Market Alternatives
Category Neutral
Sectors
  • Basic Materials 0.00%
  • Communication Services 0.00%
  • Consumer Cyclicals 13.96%
  • Consumer Defensive 0.00%
  • Energy 0.00%
  • Financial Services 18.82%
  • Healthcare 15.95%
  • Industrials 5.08%
  • Real Estate 0.00%
  • Technology 41.02%
  • Utilities 5.17%
Regions
  • Europe Developed 15.12%
  • North America 75.00%
  • United Kingdom 9.88%

Adam says: Learn how to confidently invest for retirement!

Join the Minafi Investor Bootcamp to see how.

This 10-course bootcamp starts at only $10 for everything!

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2024   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo