ALTY vs EXHAX Fund Comparison

A comparison between ALTY and EXHAX based on their expense ratio, growth, holdings and how well they match their benchmark performance.

Group Created with Sketch.

Minafi's Take on ALTY vs EXHAX

Here's an in depth look at the differences between Global X SuperDividend Alternatives ETF ($ALTY) and Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series Class S ($EXHAX).

To start off, here's a look at the basics of each fund. Keep an eye on the FI Score. That's a custom score from 0 to 100 that we generate based on how good this fund is for the casual investor. Most investors only need a handful of total funds in their portfolio. The higher the score, the more likely this is one of those few. Score alone isn't enough! Keep reading on to see how different (or perhaps similar) these two funds are.

  • alty
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Global X SuperDividend Alternatives ETF

Expenses: 2.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

31% FI Score
  • exhax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series Class S

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

$ALTY is classified as an ETF while $EXHAX is classified as a Mutual Fund. Even though one of these is a mutual fund and the other is an ETF, that doesn't matter too much for their holdings. Both ETFs and mutual funds are just containers to hold lots of investments inside of them.

The biggest differences between these two is where they may be offered. ETFs are more widely availble from a larger number of investment apps and websites. Mutual funds, on the other hand, are generally offered by the platform they're issued by (Fidelity funds on Fidelity, Vanguard funds on Vanguard). Usually 401(k)'s will offer both ETFs and Mutual Funds. If you're investing outside of a 401(k), I'd recommend you verify the fees associated with ETF and mutual fund transactions. Some platforms charge an additional fee to purchase a mutual fund.

To learn more about the difference between these two, you can read about the difference between ETFs and Mutual Funds.

When evaluating a fund, the first things I look at are:

  • What it invests in
  • How much it charges in fees
  • How large the fund is

Let's look into these criteria one by one and see if either of these funds stands out.

Fund Holdings Comparison

Both of these funds are Allocation All-In-One funds – which means they're likely both investing in about the same investments behind the scenes.

Minafi's FI Score algorithm takes into account the category and market. The more niche a fund is, the lower the score. This doesn't mean it's a worse fund, but it does mean you should stop and make sure this a fund you need to diversify your portfolio.

ALTY EXHAX
Market Score 0.5 /10 4.2 /10
Category Score 5.0 /10 5.0 /10
Total 5.5 9.2

A score of 10 means this is a solid market and category that almost every investor will want to have investments in. The lower the score, the more specific the investment. These scores are based on when most investors would add these funds to their portfolio. A score of 10 means that this fund (or one like it) belongs in a three-fund portfolio. The lower the score, the farther down in your portfolio a fund would go.

Winner: $EXHAX

Fee Comparison

Fees are one of the biggest killers of portfolio growth. The difference between a 2% fee and a 0.04% fee over 30 years can result in your portfolio having half the total value!

If you're just getting started investing and learning how fees impact your portfolio, I'd encourage you to read through my free investment course (specifically '2.2 - All About Fees') where I go over all the different types of fees you can be charged and how to lower them.

For these two funds, ALTY has an expense ratio of 2.95% while EXHAX has an expense ratio of 1.10%. In this case, both of these funds have a similar fee.

Winner: $EXHAX (barely)

Fund Size Comparison

Both ALTY and EXHAX have a similar number of assets under management. ALTY has 16.1 Million in assets under management, while EXHAX has 363 Million.

Minafi categorizes both of these funds as small funds. Fund size is a good indication of how many other investors trust this fund. A large fund by itself doesn't mean it's a good fund, but it is one thing to consider when figuring out how to choose the right fund.

Winner: tie

Which Should You Choose? ALTY or EXHAX?

Since both of these funds are Allocation All-In-One funds, you'll most likely only need to invest in one of these funds – not both. Running both of these funds through Minafi's FI Score algorithm, gives ALTY a score of 8 and EXHAX a score of 31.

Since both of these have a similar FI Score, the difference between these two if minimal. A higher FI Score doesn't mean future growth will be higher, but it does mean that it better fits criteria for a good fund. Neither of these funds has an FI Score above 90 – which is a red flag. I'd look into more funds to find one with a higher FI Score.

Winner: Neither, I'd research more funds if you're looking to invest for retirement.

$ALTY

Global X SuperDividend Alternatives ETF

8

Read More
Ratings
Rating Type Rating
Diversification Score 0 /10
Expense Ratio Score 0 /10
Expense Rating 0 /10
Market Score 1 /10
Category Score 5 /10
Overview
Overview Details
Fund Type ETF
Inception Date Jul-13-2015
Exchange NASDAQ
Expense Ratio 2.950%
Net Assets 16.1 Million
Yield 10.59%
Holdings
Description Info
Market Allocation
Category All-In-One
Sectors
  • Basic Materials 0.34%
  • Communication Services 1.20%
  • Consumer Cyclicals 1.25%
  • Consumer Defensive 0.99%
  • Energy 24.65%
  • Financial Services 28.83%
  • Healthcare 1.67%
  • Industrials 1.17%
  • Real Estate 23.69%
  • Technology 2.74%
  • Utilities 13.45%
Regions
  • Africa/Middle East 0.69%
  • Asia Developed 2.65%
  • Asia Emerging 0.05%
  • Australasia 0.10%
  • Europe Developed 1.02%
  • Japan 0.51%
  • Latin America 0.03%
  • North America 94.55%
  • United Kingdom 0.40%

$EXHAX

Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series Class S

31

Read More
Ratings
Rating Type Rating
Expense Ratio Score 4 /10
Expense Rating 0 /10
Market Score 4 /10
Category Score 5 /10
Overview
Overview Details
Fund Type Mutual Fund
Inception Date Nov-1-1995
Exchange NMFQS
Expense Ratio 1.100%
Net Assets 363 Million
Yield 0.32%
Holdings
Description Info
Market Allocation
Category All-In-One
Sectors
  • Basic Materials 2.49%
  • Communication Services 13.85%
  • Consumer Cyclical 14.13%
  • Consumer Defensive 15.48%
  • Energy 6.64%
  • Financial Services 16.70%
  • Healthcare 11.85%
  • Industrials 3.69%
  • Real Estate 5.05%
  • Technology 10.10%
  • Utilities 0.00%
Regions
  • Asia Developed 0.71%
  • Asia Emerging 2.52%
  • Australasia 0.11%
  • Europe Developed 10.45%
  • Japan 3.18%
  • Latin America 0.63%
  • North America 78.95%
  • United Kingdom 3.45%

Adam says: Learn how to confidently invest for retirement!

Join the Minafi Investor Bootcamp to see how.

This 10-course bootcamp starts at only $10 for everything!

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2024   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo