ACBPX vs FLRQX Fund Comparison

A comparison between ACBPX and FLRQX based on their expense ratio, growth, holdings and how well they match their benchmark performance.

Group Created with Sketch.

Minafi's Take on ACBPX vs FLRQX

Here's an in depth look at the differences between American Century Diversified Bond Fund I Class ($ACBPX) and Franklin LifeSmart™ 2020 Retirement Target Fund Class C ($FLRQX).

To start off, here's a look at the basics of each fund. Keep an eye on the FI Score. That's a custom score from 0 to 100 that we generate based on how good this fund is for the casual investor. Most investors only need a handful of total funds in their portfolio. The higher the score, the more likely this is one of those few. Score alone isn't enough! Keep reading on to see how different (or perhaps similar) these two funds are.

75% FI Score
  • acbpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

American Century Diversified Bond Fund I Class

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

14% FI Score
  • flrqx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Franklin LifeSmart™ 2020 Retirement Target Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Both $ACBPX and $FLRQX are categorized as Mutual Funds. Mutual funds are often offered by 401(k) platforms and are essentially the same as ETFs. Mutual funds are generally offered by an investment platform – Fidelity has Fidelity mutual funds, Vanguard has Vanguard mutual funds. Mutual funds are ideal for retirement investing since you can invest any amount. That allows you to invest every last cent and benefit from the market.

The biggest disadvantage of mutual funds is that you're usually limited to the funds on your investment platform. If you're investing on Fidelity, you'll want to pick Fidelity mutual funds (or any ETF). Same with Vanguard. Some platforms offer mutual funds from other platforms, but they may charge a purchse or redemption fee. I'd recommend using the same platform as your funds – or stick to ETFs.

To learn more about the difference between these two, you can read about the difference between ETFs and Mutual Funds.

When evaluating a fund, the first things I look at are:

  • What it invests in
  • How much it charges in fees
  • How large the fund is

Let's look into these criteria one by one and see if either of these funds stands out.

Fund Holdings Comparison

Minafi's FI Score algorithm takes into account the category and market. The more niche a fund is, the lower the score. This doesn't mean it's a worse fund, but it does mean you should stop and make sure this a fund you need to diversify your portfolio.

ACBPX FLRQX
Market Score 6.9 /10 1.6 /10
Category Score 10.0 /10 5.0 /10
Total 16.9 6.6

A score of 10 means this is a solid market and category that almost every investor will want to have investments in. The lower the score, the more specific the investment. These scores are based on when most investors would add these funds to their portfolio. A score of 10 means that this fund (or one like it) belongs in a three-fund portfolio. The lower the score, the farther down in your portfolio a fund would go.

Winner: $ACBPX

Fee Comparison

Fees are one of the biggest killers of portfolio growth. The difference between a 2% fee and a 0.04% fee over 30 years can result in your portfolio having half the total value!

If you're just getting started investing and learning how fees impact your portfolio, I'd encourage you to read through my free investment course (specifically '2.2 - All About Fees') where I go over all the different types of fees you can be charged and how to lower them.

For these two funds, ACBPX has an expense ratio of 0.40% while FLRQX has an expense ratio of 1.10%.

Winner: $ACBPX

Fund Size Comparison

One place these two funds differ is in their total assets under management. This is a good indication of how many other investors trust this fund. A large fund by itself doesn't mean it's a good fund, but it is one thing to consider when figuring out how to choose the right fund.

In the case of these two funds, ACBPX is a medium fund with 2.35 Billion in assets under management. FLRQX, on the other hand, is a small fund with 37.1 Million in assets under management.

Winner: $ACBPX, American Century Diversified Bond Fund I Class

Which Should You Choose? ACBPX or FLRQX?

Comparing these two funds isn't an apples to apples comparison. ACBPX is a Bond Total US Bond Market fund, while FLRQX is a Allocation Target-Date fund.

If you're aiming to build a diversified, low-fee, tax-optimized portfolio you likely won't be choosing between these two funds since they're different enough.

Running both of these funds through Minafi's FI Score algorithm, gives ACBPX a score of 75 and FLRQX a score of 14.

Winner: Neither, I'd research more funds if you're looking to invest for retirement.

$ACBPX

American Century Diversified Bond Fund I Class

75

Read More
Ratings
Rating Type Rating
Expense Ratio Score 9 /10
Expense Rating 6 /10
Market Score 7 /10
Category Score 10 /10
Overview
Overview Details
Fund Type Mutual Fund
Inception Date Apr-1-1993
Exchange NMFQS
Expense Ratio 0.400%
Net Assets 2.35 Billion
Yield 2.30%
Holdings
Description Info
Market Bond
Category Total US Bond Market
Sectors
  • Agency MBS ARM 1.05%
  • Agency MBS CMO 0.69%
  • Agency MBS Pass-Through 12.01%
  • Asset-Backed 9.13%
  • Bank Loan 0.00%
  • Cash & Equivalents 9.22%
  • Commercial MBS 3.46%
  • Convertible 1.53%
  • Corporate 28.99%
  • Corporate Bond 27.46%
  • Covered Bond 0.00%
  • Government 30.19%
  • Municipal 2.00%
  • Non-Agency Residential MBS 2.73%
  • Non-U.S. Government 0.75%
  • Other 0.54%
  • Other Government Related 10.44%
  • Preferred 0.00%
  • Securitized 29.07%
  • U.S. Agency 0.30%
  • U.S. Treasury 18.07%
  • U.S. Treasury Inflation-Protected 0.63%

$FLRQX

Franklin LifeSmart™ 2020 Retirement Target Fund Class C

14

Read More
Ratings
Rating Type Rating
Expense Ratio Score 1 /10
Expense Rating 0 /10
Market Score 2 /10
Category Score 5 /10
Overview
Overview Details
Fund Type Mutual Fund
Inception Date Jul-1-2013
Exchange NMFQS
Expense Ratio 1.100%
Net Assets 37.1 Million
Yield 1.61%
Holdings
Description Info
Market Allocation
Category Target-Date
Sectors
  • Basic Materials 4.69%
  • Communication Services 7.85%
  • Consumer Cyclical 10.11%
  • Consumer Defensive 8.77%
  • Energy 3.25%
  • Financial Services 10.32%
  • Healthcare 16.03%
  • Industrials 13.66%
  • Real Estate 2.79%
  • Technology 19.33%
  • Utilities 3.19%
Regions
  • Africa/Middle East 0.52%
  • Asia Developed 3.39%
  • Asia Emerging 4.80%
  • Australasia 1.06%
  • Europe Developed 10.52%
  • Europe Emerging 0.60%
  • Japan 5.84%
  • Latin America 0.68%
  • North America 68.43%
  • United Kingdom 4.16%

Adam says: Learn how to confidently invest for retirement!

Join the Minafi Investor Bootcamp to see how.

This 10-course bootcamp starts at only $10 for everything!

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2024   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo