AACFX vs MCHI Fund Comparison

A comparison between AACFX and MCHI based on their expense ratio, growth, holdings and how well they match their benchmark performance.

Group Created with Sketch.

Minafi's Take on AACFX vs MCHI

Here's an in depth look at the differences between Invesco Greater China Fund Class A ($AACFX) and iShares MSCI China ETF ($MCHI).

To start off, here's a look at the basics of each fund. Keep an eye on the FI Score. That's a custom score from 0 to 100 that we generate based on how good this fund is for the casual investor. Most investors only need a handful of total funds in their portfolio. The higher the score, the more likely this is one of those few. Score alone isn't enough! Keep reading on to see how different (or perhaps similar) these two funds are.

34% FI Score
  • aacfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Invesco Greater China Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

65% FI Score
  • mchi
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

iShares MSCI China ETF

Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

$AACFX is classified as a Mutual Fund while $MCHI is classified as an ETF. Even though one of these is a mutual fund and the other is an ETF, that doesn't matter too much for their holdings. Both ETFs and mutual funds are just containers to hold lots of investments inside of them.

The biggest differences between these two is where they may be offered. ETFs are more widely availble from a larger number of investment apps and websites. Mutual funds, on the other hand, are generally offered by the platform they're issued by (Fidelity funds on Fidelity, Vanguard funds on Vanguard). Usually 401(k)'s will offer both ETFs and Mutual Funds. If you're investing outside of a 401(k), I'd recommend you verify the fees associated with ETF and mutual fund transactions. Some platforms charge an additional fee to purchase a mutual fund.

To learn more about the difference between these two, you can read about the difference between ETFs and Mutual Funds.

When evaluating a fund, the first things I look at are:

  • What it invests in
  • How much it charges in fees
  • How large the fund is

Let's look into these criteria one by one and see if either of these funds stands out.

Fund Holdings Comparison

Both of these funds are International Stocks China Stock funds – which means they're likely both investing in about the same investments behind the scenes.

Minafi's FI Score algorithm takes into account the category and market. The more niche a fund is, the lower the score. This doesn't mean it's a worse fund, but it does mean you should stop and make sure this a fund you need to diversify your portfolio.

Market Score 6.0 /10 9.9 /10
Category Score 5.0 /10 5.0 /10
Total 11.0 14.9

A score of 10 means this is a solid market and category that almost every investor will want to have investments in. The lower the score, the more specific the investment. These scores are based on when most investors would add these funds to their portfolio. A score of 10 means that this fund (or one like it) belongs in a three-fund portfolio. The lower the score, the farther down in your portfolio a fund would go.

Winner: $MCHI

Fee Comparison

Fees are one of the biggest killers of portfolio growth. The difference between a 2% fee and a 0.04% fee over 30 years can result in your portfolio having half the total value!

If you're just getting started investing and learning how fees impact your portfolio, I'd encourage you to read through my free investment course (specifically '2.2 - All About Fees') where I go over all the different types of fees you can be charged and how to lower them.

For these two funds, AACFX has an expense ratio of 1.76% while MCHI has an expense ratio of 0.59%.

Winner: $MCHI

Fund Size Comparison

One place these two funds differ is in their total assets under management. This is a good indication of how many other investors trust this fund. A large fund by itself doesn't mean it's a good fund, but it is one thing to consider when figuring out how to choose the right fund.

In the case of these two funds, AACFX is a medium fund with 71.7 Million in assets under management. MCHI, on the other hand, is a large fund with 5.29 Billion in assets under management.

Winner: $MCHI, iShares MSCI China ETF

Which Should You Choose? AACFX or MCHI?

Since both of these funds are International Stocks China Stock funds, you'll most likely only need to invest in one of these funds – not both. Running both of these funds through Minafi's FI Score algorithm, gives AACFX a score of 34 and MCHI a score of 65.

Neither of these funds has an FI Score above 90 – which is a red flag. I'd look into more funds to find one with a higher FI Score.

Winner: Neither, I'd research more funds if you're looking to invest for retirement.


Invesco Greater China Fund Class A


Read More
Rating Type Rating
Expense Ratio Score 2 /10
Expense Rating 0 /10
Market Score 6 /10
Category Score 5 /10
Overview Details
Fund Type Mutual Fund
Inception Date Mar-31-2006
Exchange NMFQS
Expense Ratio 1.760%
Net Assets 71.7 Million
Yield 1.02%
Description Info
Market International Stocks
Category China Stock
  • Basic Materials 2.20%
  • Communication Services 28.38%
  • Consumer Cyclical 40.06%
  • Consumer Defensive 10.50%
  • Energy 0.00%
  • Financial Services 1.19%
  • Healthcare 14.70%
  • Industrials 1.98%
  • Real Estate 0.00%
  • Technology 0.16%
  • Utilities 0.84%
  • Asia Developed 13.06%
  • Asia Emerging 85.10%
  • North America 1.84%


iShares MSCI China ETF


Read More
Rating Type Rating
Diversification Score 3 /10
Expense Ratio Score 8 /10
Expense Rating 4 /10
Market Score 10 /10
Category Score 5 /10
Overview Details
Fund Type ETF
Inception Date Mar-29-2011
Exchange NASDAQ
Expense Ratio 0.590%
Net Assets 5.29 Billion
Yield 1.53%
Description Info
Market International Stocks
Category China Stock
  • Basic Materials 1.80%
  • Communication Services 21.73%
  • Consumer Cyclicals 29.33%
  • Consumer Defensive 5.82%
  • Energy 2.48%
  • Financial Services 16.63%
  • Healthcare 5.29%
  • Industrials 5.00%
  • Real Estate 5.19%
  • Technology 4.75%
  • Utilities 1.97%
  • Asia Developed 1.46%
  • Asia Emerging 98.37%
  • North America 0.17%

Adam says: Learn how to confidently invest for retirement!

Join the Minafi Investor Bootcamp to see how.

This 10-course bootcamp starts at only $10 for everything!

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2024   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo