Expense Ratio Rating
3 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
4 /10
Category Score
10 /10
Market Size
4 /10
We found 668 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
BNY Mellon Sustainable U.S. Equity Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
Goldman Sachs U.S. Tax-Managed Equity Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
Touchstone Focused Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF
Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
Pacific Funds Large-Cap Advisor Class
Expenses: 0.67% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
Essential 40 Stock Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
Pax ESG Beta Quality Fund Individual Investor Class
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.
Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!
Join & Get Your First Course Free© 2024 Adam Fortuna
Site Map