Expense Ratio Rating
6 /10
Expense Rating
2 /10
Market Score
5 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
5 /10
$SGHAX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- shyox
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Western Asset Global High Yield Bond Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- psrzx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PIMCO Senior Floating Rate Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- nhicx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Neuberger Berman High Income Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- plbcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- nstix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Columbia Short Term Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.38% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- bifix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
William Blair Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- dflax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
BNY Mellon Floating Rate Income Fund - Class A
Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ifrax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Voya Floating Rate Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- paxhx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Pax High Yield Bond Fund Individual Investor Class
Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »