Expense Ratio Rating
2 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
1 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
1 /10
$RYLGX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 643 US Stocks Large Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- hsuax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Rational Dynamic Brands Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- ldvcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Leland Thomson Reuters Venture Capital Index Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- meifx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Meridian Enhanced Equity Fund® Legacy Class
Expenses: 1.58% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- qblgx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Federated MDT Large Cap Growth Fund Class B Shares
Expenses: 2.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- cpecx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Catalyst Dynamic Alpha Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- qclgx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Federated MDT Large Cap Growth Fund Class C Shares
Expenses: 2.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- usmcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
AlphaSimplex Tactical U.S. Market Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- pgiex
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Putnam Focused Equity Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- tvdax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Guggenheim RBP® Large-Cap Defensive Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »