Diversification Rating
9 /10
Expense Ratio Rating
8 /10
Expense Rating
5 /10
Market Score
7 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
7 /10
$REM Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 11,026 Alternatives Real Estate funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- hips
- ETF
- Allocation
- All-In-One
GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF
Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- fue
- ETF
- Commodities
- Focused
ELEMENTS Linked to the MLCX Biofuels Index (Exchange Series) - Total Return
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »
- eisdx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Value
Carillon ClariVest International Stock Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »
- lbhax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
BrandywineGLOBAL - Global High Yield Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mgpix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Growth
ProFunds Mid Cap Growth Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.73% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- ld
- ETF
- Commodities
- Focused
iPath Bloomberg Lead Subindex Total Return(SM) ETN
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »
- mlscx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Aberdeen Focused U.S. Equity Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- neomx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Growth
Neiman Opportunities Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- ablcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
AllianzGI Retirement 2030 Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »