• pkbix
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

Payden/Kravitz Cash Balance Plan Fund SI Class

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• pmccx
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• Municipal Bond

BNY Mellon Connecticut Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

• pyrex
• Mutual Fund
• Alternatives
• Real Estate

Pioneer Real Estate Fund Class Y

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

• rltcx
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Total World

RiverFront Asset Allocation Aggressive Class C

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

• ryagx
• Mutual Fund
• Alternatives
• Inverse

Rydex Inverse Mid-Cap Strategy Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »

• prmcx
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Target-Date

Putnam RetirementReady Maturity Class C

Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

• tfgcx
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• Total US Bond Market

American Beacon TwentyFour Strategic Income Fund C Class

Expenses: 1.87% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

• rjz
• ETF
• Commodities
• Focused

ELEMENTS Linked to the Rogers International Commodity Index - Metals Total Return

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

• rdpix
• Mutual Fund
• Money Market
• World

ProFunds Rising U.S. Dollar Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a World Money Market fund. See why »

• rrpix
• Mutual Fund
• Alternative
• Inverse

ProFunds Rising Rates Opportunity Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »