Expense Ratio Rating
10 /10
Expense Rating
7 /10
Market Score
7 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
7 /10
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
MFS Global Growth Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Crossmark Steward Global Equity Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.64% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Cohen & Steers Alternative Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Columbia Global Dividend Opportunity Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Transamerica Global Equity Class I
Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund Class Y
Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Invesco Oppenheimer Global Focus Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Artisan Global Equity Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.38% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
BMO Global Low Volatility Equity Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Goldman Sachs Satellite Strategies Portfolio Class C
Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.
Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!
Join & Get Your First Course Free© 2024 Adam Fortuna
Site Map