• saocx
• Mutual Fund
• Alternatives
• Short

Guggenheim Alpha Opportunity Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

• heozx
• Mutual Fund
• Alternatives
• Short

Highland Long/Short Equity Fund Class Z

Expenses: 2.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

• hhcax
• Mutual Fund
• Alternatives
• Short

Highland Healthcare Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 2.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

• rmbfx
• Mutual Fund
• Alternatives
• Short

RMB Mendon Financial Long/Short Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.96% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

• rysrx
• Mutual Fund
• Alternatives
• Short

Guggenheim Long Short Equity Fund Class P

Expenses: 1.77% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

• capox
• Mutual Fund
• Alternatives
• Short

Absolute Capital Opportunities Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 3.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

• vmot
• ETF
• Alternatives
• Short

Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF

Expenses: 2.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

• hedjx
• Mutual Fund
• Alternatives
• Short

Scharf Alpha Opportunity Fund Retail Class

Expenses: 1.66% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

• nclix
• Mutual Fund
• Alternatives
• Short

Nuance Concentrated Value Long-Short Fund Investor Class Shares

Expenses: 3.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

• jahsx
• Mutual Fund
• Alternatives
• Short

James Alpha EHS Portfolio Class S

Expenses: 1.36% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »