Expense Ratio Rating
7 /10
Expense Rating
1 /10
Market Score
3 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
3 /10
$JOBIX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- appix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Appleseed Fund Institutional Share
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- pgp
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
PIMCO Global StocksPLUS and Income Fund
Expenses: 2.64% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- igeix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Voya Global Equity Dividend Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.83% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- sglix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
SGI Global Equity Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- peqbx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Putnam Global Equity Fund Class B
Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- revcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Columbia Global Equity Value Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.89% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- gggix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Gabelli Global Growth Fund Class Institutional
Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- ekgix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Wells Fargo Global Small Cap Fund Class Inst
Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- ktrcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
DWS Global Income Builder Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.68% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »