Expense Ratio Rating
8 /10
Expense Rating
2 /10
Market Score
3 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
3 /10
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
Neuberger Berman Global Allocation Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Nuveen Santa Barbara Global Dividend Growth Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Virtus KAR Global Quality Dividend Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
MFS Blended Research Global Equity Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.64% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Eaton Vance Global Small-Cap Equity Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Catalyst/MAP Global Balanced Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Aberdeen Global Equity Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
RiskPro® PFG Aggressive 30+ Fund Class R
Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
RiskPro® Dynamic 15-25 Fund Class R
Expenses: 2.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.
Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!
Join & Get Your First Course Free© 2024 Adam Fortuna
Site Map