Expense Ratio Rating
1 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
6 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
6 /10
$GLVCX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- mevox
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Lazard Managed Equity Volatility Portfolio Open Shares
Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- lpefx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
ALPS/Red Rocks Global Opportunity Fund Class Investor
Expenses: 1.44% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- cennx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Centerstone Investors Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- lsagx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- wagox
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Wasatch Global Opportunities Fund® Investor Class
Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- imnax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Transamerica Global Equity Class A
Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- dprex
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Delaware Global Listed Real Assets Fund A Class
Expenses: 1.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- rlgcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
RiverFront Asset Allocation Growth & Income Class C
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- nqgcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Nuveen NWQ Global Equity Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »