Expense Ratio Rating
0 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
1 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
1 /10
$GLLCX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- mecdx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
MainStay Epoch Capital Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- pgmax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
PIMCO Global Core Asset Allocation Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.58% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- gprox
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Grandeur Peak Global Reach Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- wggnx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
William Blair Global Leaders Fund Class N
Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- mcgcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc.Investor C Shares
Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- hrlax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Hartford Global Real Asset Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- ecdix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Dividend Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- evgbc
- ETF
- Allocation
- Total World
Eaton Vance Global Income Builder NextShares
Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- ugeix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
USAA Global Equity Income Fund Fund Shares
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »