Expense Ratio Rating
1 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
2 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
2 /10
$EMDCX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- hfhcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Hartford Floating Rate High Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- nefhx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Loomis Sayles High Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pficx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Putnam Floating Rate Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- dpfcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Deer Park Total Return Credit Fund Class C
Expenses: 3.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- jeccx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
JPMorgan Emerging Markets Strategic Debt Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.69% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ihfax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Integrity High Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- atpax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Aquila Three Peaks High Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- emtcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Transamerica Emerging Markets Debt Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- flrcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Pioneer Floating Rate Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »