Expense Ratio Rating
9 /10
Expense Rating
7 /10
Market Score
1 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
1 /10
$EMAG Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- frfax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PGIM Floating Rate Income Fund- Class A
Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- tgwnx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
TCW Emerging Markets Local Currency Income Fund Class N
Expenses: 0.92% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ssicx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Sierra Tactical Core Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- phylx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Putnam High Yield Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- lsfcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Loomis Sayles Senior Floating Rate and Fixed Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- arssx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Aristotle Strategic Credit Fund
Expenses: 0.62% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- masax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
MainStay MacKay Unconstrained Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- phybx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Putnam High Yield Fund Class B
Expenses: 1.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- gfrcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Goldman Sachs High Yield Floating Rate Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »