EEMA : iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF

EEMA is a International Stocks Market Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock with LOW fees.

EEMA

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF

FI Score

60 /100

Diversification Rating

5 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

8 /10

Expense Rating

5 /10

Market Score

7 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

7 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,038 International Stocks Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare EEMA vs HBYAX

13% FI Score
  • hbyax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

HSBC High Yield Fund A

Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare EEMA vs HIPS

13% FI Score
  • hips
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF

Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare EEMA vs FUE

13% FI Score
  • fue
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

ELEMENTS Linked to the MLCX Biofuels Index (Exchange Series) - Total Return

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare EEMA vs LBHAX

13% FI Score
  • lbhax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

BrandywineGLOBAL - Global High Yield Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare EEMA vs MGPIX

13% FI Score
  • mgpix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

ProFunds Mid Cap Growth Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.73% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EEMA vs LD

13% FI Score
  • ld
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

iPath Bloomberg Lead Subindex Total Return(SM) ETN

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare EEMA vs MLSCX

13% FI Score
  • mlscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Aberdeen Focused U.S. Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EEMA vs MSURX

13% FI Score
  • msurx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. U.S. Real Estate Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare EEMA vs NEOMX

13% FI Score
  • neomx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Neiman Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EEMA vs ABLCX

13% FI Score
  • ablcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

AllianzGI Retirement 2030 Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2024   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo