Diversification Rating
0 /10
Expense Ratio Rating
6 /10
Expense Rating
5 /10
Market Score
2 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
2 /10
$DVYA Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 10,038 International Stocks Asia/Pacific Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- qbdax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
Quantified Managed Income Fund Advisor Class
Expenses: 2.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- rbcgx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Reynolds Blue Chip Growth Fund
Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- rrfcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Government Bond
Federated Real Return Bond Fund Class C Shares
Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »
- reiax
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Real Estate
West Loop Realty Fund Class A Shares
Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »
- rycdx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternative
- Inverse
Rydex Inverse NASDAQ-100® 2x Strategy Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.58% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »
- rycpx
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Consumer Defensive
Rydex Consumer Products Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Consumer Defensive Sector Equity fund. See why »
- sdp
- ETF
- Alternative
- Inverse
ProShares UltraShort Utilities
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »
- sdvcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
AIG Select Dividend Growth Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- tiagx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Growth
Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »