Expense Ratio Rating
2 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
8 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
8 /10
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
The Hartford Global Real Asset Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Concentrated Portfolio Class I
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
ALPS/Red Rocks Global Opportunity Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Lazard Global Dynamic Multi-Asset Portfolio Open Shares
Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Virtus KAR Global Quality Dividend Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
PIMCO Dividend and Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Aberdeen Dynamic Dividend Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Federated Hermes Global Small Cap Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.94% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Conductor Global Equity Value Fund Class Y
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.
Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!
Join & Get Your First Course Free© 2024 Adam Fortuna
Site Map