Expense Ratio Rating
8 /10
Expense Rating
7 /10
Market Score
6 /10
Category Score
10 /10
Market Size
6 /10
We found 7,874 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
First Trust Hong Kong AlphaDEX Fund
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »
Amplify CrowdBureau(R) Peer-to-Peer Lending & Crowdfunding ETF
Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »
Thornburg Limited Term U.S. Government Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »
Federated Fund for U.S. Government Securities Class A shares
Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »
LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Goldman Sachs Target Date 2030 Portfolio A Shares
Expenses: 0.58% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
Aberdeen International Equity Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »
BlackRock Asian Dragon Fund,Inc.Investor C Shares
Expenses: 2.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »
Hartford Floating Rate High Income Fund Class R3
Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.
Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!
Join & Get Your First Course Free© 2024 Adam Fortuna
Site Map