Expense Ratio Rating
5 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
2 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
2 /10
$AGIAX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 748 Allocation All-In-One funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- mbnbx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
MainStay Balanced Fund Class B
Expenses: 2.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- cmalx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Crawford Multi-Asset Income Fund
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- hwacx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Hotchkis & Wiley Value Opportunities Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- mbacx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
MainStay Balanced Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- ioezx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
ICON Equity Income Fund Class S
Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- poacx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Conservative Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- rpccx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Columbia Capital Allocation Conservative Portfolio Class C
Expenses: 1.32% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- etnmx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Eventide Multi-Asset Income Fund Class N
Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- sbacx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Touchstone Balanced Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »