Expense Ratio Rating
2 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
10 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
10 /10
$AEPCX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 9,394 International Stocks Large Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- ccdvx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Calamos Dividend Growth Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- dabax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Delaware Global Value Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.44% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- dag
- ETF
- Commodities
- Focused
DB Agriculture Double Long ETN
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »
- dgbp
- ETF
- Money Market
- World
Citigroup ETNs linked to the VelocityShares Daily 4X Long USD vs. GBP Index
Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a World Money Market fund. See why »
- rylvx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Rydex S&P 500 Pure Value Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.61% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- eixax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Catalyst Enhanced Income Strategy Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pcyix
- Mutual Fund
- Commodities
- Broad
PCS Commodity Strategy Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »
- ryhix
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Healthcare
Rydex Health Care Fund Class Investor
Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »
- emdax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PGIM Emerging Markets Debt Local Currency Fund-Class A
Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »